TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @RDS_krytay

@RDS_krytay: statistics and cleanliness index

RDS

лс: @fales_es

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-03
Subscribers
65
Median views
164
ERR
252.3%
Posts sampled
37
Niche Blogs
Post language Russian
Channel age 8 months

Data from 2026-10-03 — 5 days old.

Assessment summary

A personal lifestyle blog featuring short notes, photos, and videos from everyday life. Publications gain noticeably more views than the channel's subscriber count: an ERR of 252.3% surpasses 11 out of 18 similar catalog channels, and over the past three weeks, the median views have doubled.

Some messages are missing from the numbering sequence (about 73% of IDs are omitted), and new posts appear on average once every three days. Due to the small subscriber base, the overall reach remains intimate, despite the high relative view rate.

What to pay attention to

Some messages were deleted: ≈73% of IDs are missing

There are many gaps in the channel's recent message numbering—some of them were deleted. Message IDs are counted rather than publications: each photo in an album has its own ID. Deleted posts are not visible, so the remaining ones offer only a partial view of the channel.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 18 Blogs catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 22 to 184 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 11 of 18
@RDS_krytay 252.3%
similar channels median 140.4%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 15 of 18
@RDS_krytay 1.98
similar channels median 6

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 37 posts with views, from May 31 to Oct 3. The dashed line is the median (164).

0132264May 31: 197 viewsJun 5: 194 viewsJun 15: 187 viewsJun 15: 203 viewsJun 15: 204 viewsJun 16: 228 viewsJun 16: 236 viewsJun 28: 227 viewsJun 30: 200 viewsJul 1: 264 viewsJul 10: 215 viewsJul 20: 165 viewsJul 25: 157 viewsAug 3: 132 viewsAug 3: 172 viewsAug 5: 196 viewsAug 5: 201 viewsAug 15: 164 viewsAug 17: 189 viewsAug 21: 182 viewsAug 30: 97 viewsAug 30: 108 viewsAug 30: 122 viewsAug 31: 102 viewsSep 1: 101 viewsSep 2: 127 viewsSep 5: 115 viewsSep 5: 118 viewsSep 5: 158 viewsSep 6: 166 viewsSep 14: 100 viewsSep 15: 103 viewsSep 16: 114 viewsSep 17: 122 viewsSep 26: 80 viewsOct 2: 32 viewsOct 3: 9 views May 31Oct 3
  • post views
  • 2 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 164

Maximum: 264 views. Data as of Oct 3.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 17: index 97, grade A+Jun 17Sep 9: index 50, grade DSep 9Oct 3: index 96, grade A+Oct 3

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 37.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @RDS_krytay

Is the @RDS_krytay channel suitable for advertising?

Yes, advertising placement is considered justified. The channel safety score is 96 out of 100, which corresponds to an A+ grade and the "normal metrics" tier.

Why does post reach exceed the number of subscribers?

The ERR rate is 252.3%—posts are viewed more times than the base of 65 subscribers, which is typical for views coming from external sources or forwards. The median holds at 164 views.

What does the missing 73% of message IDs indicate?

This means that some technical IDs in the feed are absent. This figure includes not only deleted posts, but also individual media files when uploading albums.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-03
Sample
The latest 37 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @RDS_krytay assessment dated 2026-10-03 uses 37 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 65 subscribers, median post views were 164, ERR was 252.3%, and the cleanliness index was 96/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.