TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @polazh8080

Fake engagement check for @polazh8080

polishh ✌🏻 — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-17.

Grade D some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-17
Subscribers
120
Median views
173
ERR
144.2%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Blogs
Post language Russian
Channel age 9 months

Assessment summary

On a channel with 120 subscribers, reach exceeds the audience size, and two-thirds of publications are eventually deleted from the feed. Such post purging, combined with steady view metrics, raises suspicions of metric inflation; as a result, an advertiser risks paying for artificial traffic instead of consistent contact with real readers.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 12 checked Blogs channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 40 to 304 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 9 of 12
144.2% for @polazh8080 similar channels median: 108.3%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 7 of 12
4.89 for @polazh8080 similar channels median: 7.04

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-17
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @polazh8080 assessment dated 2026-09-17 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 120 subscribers, median post views were 173, ERR was 144.2%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Some of the views may be fake.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 2.

What grade D means

Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.

What to pay attention to

Some posts appear to have been deleted (≈65% gaps in numbering)

There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to conceal delivered ads and hide their real reach. By itself, this indicator is indirect (posts can also be deleted during edits).

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 9 to Sep 15. The dashed line is the median (173).

0108217Aug 9: 217 viewsAug 9: 215 viewsAug 10: 202 viewsAug 12: 184 viewsAug 15: 175 viewsAug 15: 175 viewsAug 15: 188 viewsAug 15: 194 viewsAug 15: 193 viewsAug 18: 175 viewsAug 18: 196 viewsAug 18: 201 viewsAug 23: 186 viewsAug 23: 189 viewsAug 23: 188 viewsAug 23: 172 viewsAug 23: 169 viewsAug 24: 198 viewsAug 24: 198 viewsAug 28: 162 viewsAug 30: 154 viewsAug 30: 156 viewsSep 2: 176 viewsSep 2: 178 viewsSep 2: 175 viewsSep 2: 169 viewsSep 5: 138 viewsSep 5: 141 viewsSep 6: 143 viewsSep 8: 142 viewsSep 8: 150 viewsSep 12: 128 viewsSep 12: 128 viewsSep 12: 128 viewsSep 12: 123 viewsSep 12: 123 viewsSep 12: 122 viewsSep 14: 83 viewsSep 15: 70 viewsSep 15: 70 views Aug 9Sep 15

Maximum: 217 views. Data as of Sep 17.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Check today: @polazh8080

Data from 2026-09-17 — 3 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @polazh8080 and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @polazh8080

Questions about @polazh8080

What is the risk level of this channel?

The channel received a risk score of 50 out of 100 due to low data confidence and signs of possible reach inflation.

Why are there more views than subscribers?

The median view count is 173 with 120 subscribers, yielding a reach rate of over 144%. This could be explained either by post forwards to acquaintances or by artificial inflation.

Does it make sense to buy advertising here?

Placement is marked as questionable: about 65% of posts are deleted, and part of the views may be inflated, which does not guarantee a return on advertising.

Similar channels in Blogs

All channels in Blogs

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @polazh8080