TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @polazh8080

@polazh8080: statistics and cleanliness index

polishh ✌🏻

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-03
Subscribers
122
Median views
182
ERR
149.2%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Blogs
Post language Russian
Channel age 10 months

Data from 2026-10-03 — 35 days old.

Assessment summary

A personal lifestyle blog featuring short videos, workout photos, and daily notes from the author.

Posts are viewed actively: the ERR is 149.2%, which is higher than 15 out of 18 similar blogs in the directory, and some messages have been deleted in the feed numbering — about 62% of IDs are missing. Sponsored posts generate a typical feed response, but the total reach is limited by the channel's small audience.

What to pay attention to

Some messages were deleted: ≈62% of IDs skipped

There are many gaps in the numbering of recent channel messages — some of them have been deleted. This counts message IDs rather than publications: each photo in an album has its own ID. Deleted posts are not visible, so the channel can only be partially evaluated based on the remaining ones.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 26 Blogs catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 41 to 318 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 17 of 26
@polazh8080 149.2%
similar channels median 89.8%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 16 of 25
@polazh8080 2.97
similar channels median 4.73

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jun 16 to Oct 2. The dashed line is the median (182).

0118236Jun 16: 171 viewsJun 24: 139 viewsJun 27: 185 viewsJul 8: 147 viewsJul 8: 179 viewsJul 8: 178 viewsJul 8: 185 viewsJul 15: 169 viewsJul 17: 174 viewsJul 26: 181 viewsJul 29: 205 viewsAug 1: 201 viewsAug 4: 191 viewsAug 9: 236 viewsAug 10: 219 viewsAug 12: 200 viewsAug 15: 210 viewsAug 18: 192 viewsAug 18: 219 viewsAug 23: 209 viewsAug 24: 220 viewsAug 28: 184 viewsAug 30: 178 viewsAug 30: 181 viewsSep 2: 211 viewsSep 5: 184 viewsSep 6: 188 viewsSep 8: 183 viewsSep 8: 198 viewsSep 12: 192 viewsSep 14: 169 viewsSep 15: 139 viewsSep 17: 131 viewsSep 17: 136 viewsSep 18: 164 viewsSep 18: 155 viewsSep 26: 94 viewsSep 27: 98 viewsSep 29: 99 viewsOct 2: 38 views Jun 16Oct 2
  • post views
  • 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 182

Maximum: 236 views. Data as of Oct 3.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Sep 17: index 50, grade DSep 17Oct 3: index 94, grade A+Oct 3

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 191 views versus 182 for regular posts — 5% higher.

Based on 3 advertising and 36 regular posts older than two days.

Without an ad label: 1 post.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @polazh8080

What are the integrity metrics of the channel @polazh8080?

The channel's integrity index is 94 out of 100, with an A+ grade and a "metrics are normal" level. The only noted detail is the deletion of some messages in the channel's history.

Is buying ads in this channel justified?

Placing ads here is justified. Sponsored posts achieve a median reach of about 191 views, which slightly exceeds the performance of regular publications.

Why do posts have more views than subscribers?

The channel's ERR reaches 149.2%, which is higher than most similar blogs in the directory. Such reach in small channels is usually associated with post forwards or non-subscribed readers viewing the feed.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-03
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @polazh8080 assessment dated 2026-10-03 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 122 subscribers, median post views were 182, ERR was 149.2%, and the cleanliness index was 94/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.