checked 2026-09-17
- Subscribers
- 120
- Median views
- 173
- ERR
- 144.2%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
On a channel with 120 subscribers, reach exceeds the audience size, and two-thirds of publications are eventually deleted from the feed. Such post purging, combined with steady view metrics, raises suspicions of metric inflation; as a result, an advertiser risks paying for artificial traffic instead of consistent contact with real readers.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 12 checked Blogs channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 40 to 304 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-17
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @polazh8080 assessment dated 2026-09-17 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 120 subscribers, median post views were 173, ERR was 144.2%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
Some of the views may be fake.
Not enough posts for a forecast.
Reach of advertising posts
Too few advertising posts to compare: 2.
What grade D means
Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.
What to pay attention to
Some posts appear to have been deleted (≈65% gaps in numbering)
There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to conceal delivered ads and hide their real reach. By itself, this indicator is indirect (posts can also be deleted during edits).
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 9 to Sep 15. The dashed line is the median (173).
- post views
- median 173
Maximum: 217 views. Data as of Sep 17.
What could not be calculated
View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-09-17 — 3 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @polazh8080 and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @polazh8080Questions about @polazh8080
What is the risk level of this channel?
The channel received a risk score of 50 out of 100 due to low data confidence and signs of possible reach inflation.
Why are there more views than subscribers?
The median view count is 173 with 120 subscribers, yielding a reach rate of over 144%. This could be explained either by post forwards to acquaintances or by artificial inflation.
Does it make sense to buy advertising here?
Placement is marked as questionable: about 65% of posts are deleted, and part of the views may be inflated, which does not guarantee a return on advertising.
Similar channels in Blogs
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.