checked 2026-09-17
- Subscribers
- 109
- Median views
- 244
- ERR
- 223.9%
- Posts sampled
- 39
Assessment summary
Views here are more than double the subscriber count, and more than half of the recent publications have been deleted — this combination of metrics raises suspicions of artificial reach inflation. For an advertiser, a microblog with around a hundred readers and an unclear origin of extra views does not provide predictable returns.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 15 checked Blogs channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 39 to 304 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-17
- Sample
- The latest 39 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @prostomura16 assessment dated 2026-09-17 uses 39 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 109 subscribers, median post views were 244, ERR was 223.9%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
Some of the views may be fake.
Not enough posts for a forecast.
Reach of advertising posts
Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 1 more are too fresh.
What grade D means
Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.
What to pay attention to
It looks like some posts have been deleted (≈56% gaps in numbering)
There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide delivered ads and conceal their actual reach. By itself, this indicator is circumstantial (posts are also deleted during edits).
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 39 posts with views, from May 23 to Sep 17. The dashed line is the median (244).
- post views
- 3 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 244
Maximum: 394 views. Data as of Sep 17.
No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-09-17 — 3 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @prostomura16 and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @prostomura16Questions about @prostomura16
Is it safe to buy ads on this channel?
Placement is considered questionable due to a medium risk of manipulation: reach may be partially artificial.
Why is the post reach higher than the subscriber count?
With 109 subscribers, posts get a median of 244 views (ERR over 220%). This can occur due to external forwards or technical inflation of the view counter.
What is this channel about?
This is a personal blog with everyday photos and videos from the author's life, studies, and hangouts with friends, with no signs of spam or fraud.
Similar channels in Blogs
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.