TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @productshelf

Fake engagement check for @productshelf

Продуктовая полка — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-07-08.

Product Management & Business 👨🏼‍💼По рекламе: @aleksusovvv https://beryl-troodon-5ff.notion.site/2848ff6e43e780c88c4cfb625cea4bbb?source=copy_link https://telega.in/c/productshelf

98/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
6441
Median views
470
ERR
7.3%
Posts sampled
38
Niche
Education

Evidence snapshot

The @productshelf assessment dated 2026-07-08 uses 38 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 6,441 subscribers, median post views were 470, ERR was 7.3%, and the cleanliness index was 98/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 380–450 views.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @productshelf

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-07-08. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @productshelf

Questions about @productshelf

What does grade A+ mean for @productshelf?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @productshelf?

ERR is 7.3%. Median post views equal 7.3% of the channel's 6,441 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 98/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @productshelf