TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @prank_crazycall

@prank_crazycall: statistics and cleanliness index

Пранк бот

Это удобный сервис для совершения телефонных розыгрыше и поздравлений. Закажите телефонный пранк звонок, чтобы разыграть своих знакомых. Наш бот позвонит на указанный номер, разыграет абонента и пришлёт запись разговора с реакцией. По рекламе:

Share this report
Telegram

Grade F many metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-29
Subscribers
59,249
Median views
206,587
ERR
348.7%
Posts sampled
33
Niche Recreation & Entertainment
Post language Russian
Channel age 4 years

Data from 2026-09-29 — 10 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel promotes prank call services and related projects; however, no posts have been published for over half a year.

Post views exceed the audience by three and a half times (ERR of 348.7% vs. 16.5% for similar channels in the catalog), while nearly half of the posts have been deleted, making it impossible to forecast the actual reach.

What to pay attention to

More views than subscribers: ERR ≈ 349%

Median views are noticeably higher than the subscriber count across half of the posts, rather than just on a single viral one. This happens when posts spread beyond the channel via reposts, chats, or external traffic, but other metrics do not support this version.

What grade F means

The index is at its lowest: the metrics fall far outside usual values, or Telegram has flagged the channel as a scam. See the “How the assessment was produced” section for details.

Channel content

📣 Heavy advertising load

Most posts in the feed are promotional calls to action to use bots and third-party services.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 11 Recreation & Entertainment catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 20,733 to 87,197 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 11 of 11
@prank_crazycall 348.7%
similar channels median 16.5%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 10 of 11
@prank_crazycall 0.34
similar channels median 1.87

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 33 posts with views, from Jun 7 to Mar 31. The dashed line is the median (206,587).

0143K285KJun 7: 157,766 viewsJun 7: 164,798 viewsJun 7: 209,627 viewsJun 10: 263,252 viewsJun 11: 285,057 viewsJul 16: 234,109 viewsAug 1: 243,207 viewsAug 31: 232,448 viewsOct 2: 193,426 viewsNov 2: 157,479 viewsNov 7: 195,405 viewsNov 13: 206,587 viewsNov 13: 265,696 viewsDec 3: 276,889 viewsDec 30: 242,795 viewsDec 30: 196,959 viewsJan 7: 226,768 viewsFeb 1: 206,972 viewsFeb 13: 201,693 viewsFeb 22: 210,148 viewsMar 8: 235,983 viewsApr 1: 248,600 viewsMay 13: 239,502 viewsMay 13: 197,346 viewsAug 19: 134,082 viewsAug 19: 200,313 viewsAug 19: 224,658 viewsDec 31: 172,411 viewsNov 12: 59,773 viewsJan 10: 40,568 viewsJan 10: 42,805 viewsFeb 10: 35,569 viewsMar 31: 22,258 views Jun 7Mar 31
  • post views
  • median 206,587

Maximum: 285,057 views. Data as of Sep 29.

What scoring found in the view pattern

More views than subscribers: ERR ≈ 349%

Median views are noticeably higher than the subscriber count across half of the posts, rather than just on a single viral one. This happens when posts spread beyond the channel via reposts, chats, or external traffic, but other metrics do not support this version.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jul 5: index 25, grade FJul 5Sep 29: index 25, grade FSep 29

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Some of the channel's metrics deviate, so it is hard to say in advance how many people will see an ad.

Not calculated: many of the channel's metrics deviate, so a forecast would be unreliable.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 193,426 views versus 206,779 for regular posts — 6% lower.

Based on 7 advertising and 26 regular posts older than two days.

Without an ad label: 5 posts.

Questions about @prank_crazycall

Is it safe to buy advertising in @prank_crazycall?

The channel received a red risk score of 75 out of 100, and placement feasibility is considered doubtful. The feed has been abandoned for half a year, and views are inconsistent with other engagement metrics.

Why does post reach exceed the number of subscribers several times over?

The channel's ERR reaches 348.7%, whereas the median for verified channels in this niche is 16.5%. At the same time, reactions on posts are extremely low — only 0.34% of the view count, so the nature of such reach remains unverified.

What reach will an ad post achieve?

It is difficult to predict the exact reach in advance: in addition to a six-month hiatus in posting, about 45% of recent posts in the channel were deleted.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-29
Sample
The latest 33 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @prank_crazycall assessment dated 2026-09-29 uses 33 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 59,249 subscribers, median post views were 206,587, ERR was 348.7%, and the cleanliness index was 25/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.