TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @tmbots

@tmbots: statistics and cleanliness index

Полезные боты

Админ: @grozny Реклама: @rklmbot Подписка: @pdpskbot

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-01
Subscribers
30,410
Median views
13,429
ERR
44.2%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Directories of Channels & Bots

Data from 2026-09-01 — 38 days old.

Assessment summary

A low risk score indicates an organic audience; however, the channel is practically abandoned — the last post was published more than two months ago, and the subscriber outflow reached 845.

Given the high share of reposts (42%) and regular post deletions (22%), placing ads here is questionable: the integration risks appearing in an inactive feed and getting lost among aggregated content.

What to pay attention to

Comments disabled on a large channel

Comments are closed on a channel with over 10,000 subscribers. Weak indicator: sometimes this is used to hide the lack of an active audience.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 6 Directories of Channels & Bots catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 849 to 316,577 subscribers.

ERR (reach) at the median
@tmbots 44.2%
similar channels median 43.9%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 3 of 5
@tmbots 0.2
similar channels median 0.36

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 15 to Jun 28. The dashed line is the median (13,429).

0118K237KSep 15: 236,952 viewsApr 10: 155,758 viewsJun 26: 143,694 viewsNov 28: 75,146 viewsFeb 5: 59,205 viewsFeb 16: 65,107 viewsMay 5: 41,973 viewsJul 24: 31,416 viewsJul 30: 33,862 viewsAug 22: 30,233 viewsOct 15: 34,810 viewsOct 17: 38,279 viewsNov 11: 38,342 viewsDec 28: 39,711 viewsMar 1: 21,138 viewsApr 28: 21,361 viewsMay 22: 21,350 viewsJul 24: 19,717 viewsAug 1: 16,292 viewsSep 9: 12,820 viewsSep 18: 14,038 viewsNov 8: 12,512 viewsNov 22: 9,606 viewsDec 3: 9,056 viewsDec 13: 8,687 viewsDec 20: 8,793 viewsJan 9: 8,914 viewsFeb 4: 8,612 viewsFeb 12: 7,362 viewsFeb 19: 7,850 viewsFeb 22: 8,131 viewsFeb 28: 10,852 viewsMar 1: 8,795 viewsMar 22: 6,081 viewsMar 23: 7,616 viewsMar 24: 7,089 viewsMar 31: 5,870 viewsApr 7: 6,406 viewsMay 8: 4,821 viewsJun 28: 2,792 views Sep 15Jun 28
  • post views
  • median 13,429

Maximum: 236,952 views. Data as of Sep 1.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 14: index 84, grade AJun 14Sep 1: index 84, grade ASep 1

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Lots of reposts: the audience is real, but your ad may get lost among them.

No new posts for over two weeks, so ad reach can't be forecast right now.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 30,233 views versus 12,512 for regular posts — 142% higher.

Based on 5 advertising and 35 regular posts older than two days.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @tmbots

Is the "Useful Bots" channel inflated with fake engagement?

The channel has a low risk score (16 out of 100), with no clear signs of fake engagement detected. The audience appears organic, although comments on the channel are closed.

What is the actual reach of the posts?

The median view count for regular posts is 12.5 thousand (ERR around 44%), but the variance in views is high. At the same time, promotional posts show a higher median — around 30.2 thousand views.

Is it advisable to buy ads on this channel?

Placement is considered questionable due to the prolonged absence of new publications and a high share of third-party reposts (42%). An ad post risks not delivering the expected return in an irregularly updated feed.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-01
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @tmbots assessment dated 2026-09-01 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 30,410 subscribers, median post views were 13,429, ERR was 44.2%, and the cleanliness index was 84/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.