TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @poslevkusiepapilkina

@poslevkusiepapilkina: statistics and cleanliness index

Репортёр Папилкин

Канал репортёра Виталия Папилкина. Современная гонзо-журналистика. Cтолкнулись с несправедливостью? Пишите @papilkin Для писем и газет: papilkin@mail.ru Дзен https://dzen.ru/papilkin Реклама: https://telega.in/channels/poslevkusiepapilkina/card/?r=95

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
6,344
Median views
1,238
ERR
19.5%
Posts sampled
40
Niche News and Media

Data from 2026-09-08 — 30 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel demonstrates natural activity typical of an author-led regional blog, with an even distribution of views and open comments.

However, a high posting frequency (over 8 posts per day) and the practice of deleting around 18% of entries create a conveyor-belt effect: an ad post gets quickly pushed down the feed, meaning the main reach will be gained only within the first hours after publication.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 16 News and Media catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 2,470 to 12,206 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 10 of 16
@poslevkusiepapilkina 19.5%
similar channels median 17.1%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 12 of 16
@poslevkusiepapilkina 0.83
similar channels median 1.29

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 3 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (1,238).

01.4K2.8KSep 3: 1,190 viewsSep 3: 1,324 viewsSep 3: 1,333 viewsSep 3: 1,307 viewsSep 4: 1,367 viewsSep 4: 1,309 viewsSep 4: 1,347 viewsSep 4: 1,357 viewsSep 4: 1,315 viewsSep 4: 1,340 viewsSep 4: 1,330 viewsSep 4: 1,279 viewsSep 4: 1,379 viewsSep 4: 951 viewsSep 4: 1,433 viewsSep 4: 1,291 viewsSep 5: 1,392 viewsSep 5: 1,337 viewsSep 5: 1,257 viewsSep 5: 1,238 viewsSep 5: 1,139 viewsSep 5: 1,153 viewsSep 5: 1,248 viewsSep 5: 1,239 viewsSep 7: 1,121 viewsSep 7: 1,147 viewsSep 7: 1,169 viewsSep 7: 1,061 viewsSep 8: 861 viewsSep 8: 770 viewsSep 8: 751 viewsSep 8: 765 viewsSep 8: 794 viewsSep 8: 688 viewsSep 8: 2,761 viewsSep 8: 298 viewsSep 8: 302 viewsSep 8: 221 viewsSep 8: 223 viewsSep 8: 220 views Sep 3Sep 8
  • post views
  • 12 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 1,238

Maximum: 2,761 views. Data as of Sep 8.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 12: index 99, grade A+Jun 12Sep 8: index 100, grade A+Sep 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

So many posts that an ad quickly slides down the feed.

About 627–1,076 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1. 3 more are too fresh.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @poslevkusiepapilkina

Are there signs of audience or view boosting on the channel?

No, the check revealed zero risk of manipulation: engagement, reactions, and growth dynamics are consistent with a real, organic audience.

Why is the ad placement feasibility rated as "questionable"?

Due to the dense posting flow (an average of 8.3 posts per day), ads quickly move down the feed and lose visibility.

What real reach will an ad post achieve?

The median post reach is about 1,200 views (ERR of around 19.5%), but the final outcome will depend on how long the post is pinned or kept at the top.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @poslevkusiepapilkina assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 6,344 subscribers, median post views were 1,238, ERR was 19.5%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.