TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @pochinka

Fake engagement check for @pochinka

Pochinka_blog — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-19.

Первый полезный техноблог Мы Никита и Витя Не скучно рассказываем о технологиях Обзоры, новости, лайфхаки, полезные фичи, безопасность в сети Авторский контент Реклама - @pochinka_reklama Реестр РКН - https://clck.ru/3FGKrP

92/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
82709
Median views
3354
ERR
4.1%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Technology

Evidence snapshot

The @pochinka assessment dated 2026-08-19 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 82,709 subscribers, median post views were 3,354, ERR was 4.1%, and the cleanliness index was 92/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

A small share of subscribers sees each post, limiting likely advertising reach.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 1,049–1,664 views.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @pochinka

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-19. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @pochinka

Questions about @pochinka

What does grade A+ mean for @pochinka?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @pochinka?

ERR is 4.1%. Median post views equal 4.1% of the channel's 82,709 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 92/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @pochinka