TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @PiarFlowInfo

@PiarFlowInfo: statistics and cleanliness index

Piar Flow Новости

Владелец: @Gr7sh @wepogp @Rich_Tagil ЧАТ: https://t.me/+5Ycbn_lfJR9mMWY8 БOT: @PiarFlowBot

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-01
Subscribers
1,612
Median views
1,154
ERR
71.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Earnings
Post language Russian
Channel age 10 months

Data from 2026-10-01 — 7 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel serves as a news feed for Piar Flow, a service for promotion and earning via tasks, publishing reports on technical maintenance and platform updates.

Although engagement is higher than most catalog channels in this niche (ERR of 71.6% vs. a median of 55.1%), the feed has been inactive for more than two weeks, which makes placing ads right now seem unreliable.

What to pay attention to

Some messages were deleted: ≈70% of IDs are missing

There are many gaps in the numbering of the channel's recent messages — some of them have been deleted. Message IDs are counted rather than publications: each photo in an album has its own ID. Deleted posts are not visible, so the remaining ones provide only a partial picture of the channel.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 8 Earnings catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 134 to 293,527 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 5 of 8
@PiarFlowInfo 71.6%
similar channels median 57.7%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 5 of 8
@PiarFlowInfo 0.53
similar channels median 0.65

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Mar 20 to Sep 12. The dashed line is the median (1,154).

02K4KMar 20: 604 viewsMar 21: 636 viewsMar 22: 595 viewsMar 22: 586 viewsMar 23: 590 viewsMar 23: 611 viewsMar 24: 603 viewsMar 24: 593 viewsMar 24: 682 viewsMar 27: 714 viewsMar 28: 754 viewsMar 28: 833 viewsMar 29: 847 viewsMar 31: 823 viewsMar 31: 1,010 viewsApr 5: 1,144 viewsApr 13: 1,433 viewsApr 13: 2,421 viewsApr 17: 1,506 viewsApr 22: 1,165 viewsApr 23: 1,141 viewsApr 25: 1,911 viewsApr 29: 1,461 viewsApr 30: 1,682 viewsMay 2: 1,899 viewsMay 5: 1,970 viewsMay 14: 1,667 viewsMay 17: 1,584 viewsMay 17: 2,316 viewsMay 22: 2,007 viewsJun 2: 2,289 viewsJun 8: 2,785 viewsJul 3: 3,956 viewsJul 15: 2,714 viewsJul 28: 3,006 viewsAug 18: 1,969 viewsAug 20: 1,839 viewsSep 10: 615 viewsSep 10: 798 viewsSep 12: 772 views Mar 20Sep 12
  • post views
  • median 1,154

Maximum: 3,956 views. Data as of Oct 1.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 22: index 92, grade A+Jun 22Sep 9: index 50, grade DSep 9Oct 1: index 89, grade AOct 1

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The channel has gone quiet — ask the owner when the next post is due.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @PiarFlowInfo

Are there any suspicious deviations in the channel's metrics?

The channel's purity index is 89 out of 100 with an A grade and a "metrics are normal" level. The only notable peculiarity is that some messages were deleted (about 70% of IDs are missing within the measurement window), and reactions are limited exclusively to paid stars.

What reach do the publications get?

Each post is read by a significant portion of the audience: median views hover around 1,154 with a base of 1,612 subscribers (ERR around 71.6%), which is higher than typical metrics for similar channels in the catalog.

Is it worth placing ads on this channel?

The feasibility of placement is considered questionable. The channel is idle and has not published fresh posts for more than two weeks, making it difficult to guarantee audience attention for a new ad.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-01
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @PiarFlowInfo assessment dated 2026-10-01 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,612 subscribers, median post views were 1,154, ERR was 71.6%, and the cleanliness index was 89/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.