TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @npv_tunneltm

@npv_tunneltm: statistics and cleanliness index

NPV TUNNEL TM

Kanalda full gowy tizlikde işleýän vpn kodlary paýlaşylyp durular aktiw bolup like bassaňyz örän gowy bolar reklama we teklipler üçin: @Reklama_hyzmaty_bot

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-01
Subscribers
12,110
Median views
444
ERR
3.7%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Computer science
Post language English 67% of posts
Channel age 5 years

Data from 2026-10-01 — 7 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel publishes configurations and keys for VPN and proxy connections (VLESS, Trojan, Shadowsocks protocols). At the same time, some messages were deleted—about 100% of post IDs are missing within the analysis window.

Posts attract little subscriber attention: an ERR of 3.7% turned out to be the lowest among 23 similar channels in the catalog, where the median stands at 10.1%. Interest in posts has noticeably weakened in recent months, which means the real ad reach will be low.

What to pay attention to

Some messages were deleted: ≈100% of IDs skipped

There are many gaps in the channel's recent message numbering—some of them were deleted. Message IDs are counted rather than posts: each photo in an album has its own ID. Deleted posts are not visible, so the remaining ones offer only a partial view of the channel.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 28 Computer science catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 4,321 to 35,704 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 27 of 28
@npv_tunneltm 3.7%
similar channels median 10.8%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 22 of 26
@npv_tunneltm 1.16
similar channels median 0.37

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 18 to Oct 1. The dashed line is the median (444).

0325650Sep 18: 496 viewsSep 18: 580 viewsSep 19: 582 viewsSep 19: 444 viewsSep 19: 437 viewsSep 19: 560 viewsSep 20: 396 viewsSep 20: 411 viewsSep 20: 342 viewsSep 20: 367 viewsSep 20: 420 viewsSep 21: 470 viewsSep 21: 498 viewsSep 22: 552 viewsSep 22: 579 viewsSep 23: 650 viewsSep 23: 630 viewsSep 24: 533 viewsSep 24: 594 viewsSep 25: 467 viewsSep 25: 503 viewsSep 26: 615 viewsSep 26: 519 viewsSep 27: 548 viewsSep 27: 500 viewsSep 28: 485 viewsSep 28: 394 viewsSep 29: 445 viewsSep 29: 319 viewsSep 30: 306 viewsSep 30: 345 viewsSep 30: 66 viewsOct 1: 68 viewsOct 1: 78 viewsOct 1: 85 viewsOct 1: 55 viewsOct 1: 17 viewsOct 1: 18 viewsOct 1: 12 viewsOct 1: 1 views Sep 18Oct 1
  • post views
  • 9 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 444

Maximum: 650 views. Data as of Oct 1.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 14: index 100, grade A+Jun 14Sep 8: index 50, grade DSep 8Oct 1: index 86, grade AOct 1

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 251–502 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1. 4 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 5 posts.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @npv_tunneltm

What is the integrity index of the channel @npv_tunneltm?

The integrity index is 86 out of 100 (grade A, "metrics normal" level). Indicators are stable, although a large gap in IDs was recorded due to deleted messages.

What share of the audience views the posts?

The median view count is 444, which corresponds to a reach (ERR) of about 3.7%. This means that only a small portion of the subscriber base regularly reads the feed.

Is it justified to place ads on this channel?

Ad placement is marked as questionable. The reason is the low reach: posts are seen by a modest share of subscribers compared to similar channels in the niche.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-01
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @npv_tunneltm assessment dated 2026-10-01 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 12,110 subscribers, median post views were 444, ERR was 3.7%, and the cleanliness index was 86/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.