TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @VPNTM

@VPNTM: statistics and cleanliness index

OneWorld VPN

OneWorld VPN Быстрый, безопасный, без ограничений. Подключайся к миру без блокировок. Reklama: @Bellireklama

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-22
Subscribers
42,396
Median views
1,112
ERR
2.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Computer science
Post language Russian 75% of posts
Channel age 5 years

Data from 2026-10-22 — 16 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel distributes ready-made VPN configs — vless, shadowsocks, and hysteria2 links to servers in Germany, the Netherlands, and Turkey — and also promotes the paid VAYLO service; it has been running for more than five years, with posts published about five times a day.

ERR of 2.6% is lower than that of similar channels in the catalog, so only a small share of the audience will see ads here. In the window of recent messages, about 31% of numbers are missing — some posts from the feed have been deleted, and outside accounts write in the comments.

About the channel

OneWorld VPN is a channel with ready-made keys for bypassing blocks: it posts vless, shadowsocks, and hysteria2 links to servers in Germany, the Netherlands, Turkey, and other countries. It has been run for more than five years, mainly with short text posts in Russian; some posts are in Turkmen.

In the catalog, @npv_tunneltm and @oneclickvpnkeys are nearby: the first has fewer subscribers, the second is larger. A post here is seen by a smaller share of subscribers than in @npv_tunneltm, @oneclickvpnkeys, and @sdghoavtrkmdlipm.

What it publishes:

  • Connection configs: vless, shadowsocks, and hysteria2 links with the server location specified.
  • Its own VAYLO service: posts with a trial period, unlimited traffic, and connection via a bot.
  • Warnings: an analysis of a free VPN database leak with a call not to use free services.

Posts are published about five times a day, more often during the day and evening Moscow time; there are almost no forwards from other channels. The feed is a stream of short technical notes with links, not long texts.

By subscribers, it ranks #45 of 102 channels in the Computer science niche of the catalog.

What to pay attention to

Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.6%

View-based engagement is below normal for a channel of this size. It may be explained by the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 36 Computer science catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 16,732 to 126,690 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 36 of 36
@VPNTM 2.6%
similar channels median 9.9%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 34 of 35
@VPNTM 1.75
similar channels median 0.36

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Oct 14 to Oct 22. The dashed line is the median (1,112).

07391.5KOct 14: 1,404 viewsOct 15: 1,361 viewsOct 15: 1,313 viewsOct 15: 1,287 viewsOct 15: 1,301 viewsOct 15: 1,429 viewsOct 15: 1,479 viewsOct 16: 1,341 viewsOct 16: 1,313 viewsOct 16: 1,333 viewsOct 16: 1,287 viewsOct 17: 1,264 viewsOct 17: 1,200 viewsOct 17: 1,204 viewsOct 17: 1,111 viewsOct 18: 1,220 viewsOct 18: 1,158 viewsOct 18: 1,116 viewsOct 18: 1,012 viewsOct 18: 1,113 viewsOct 18: 1,014 viewsOct 18: 973 viewsOct 19: 1,048 viewsOct 19: 1,080 viewsOct 19: 1,117 viewsOct 19: 1,199 viewsOct 19: 1,104 viewsOct 20: 1,077 viewsOct 20: 1,074 viewsOct 20: 1,077 viewsOct 20: 936 viewsOct 20: 833 viewsOct 21: 708 viewsOct 21: 651 viewsOct 21: 683 viewsOct 21: 697 viewsOct 22: 390 viewsOct 22: 293 viewsOct 22: 34 viewsOct 22: 32 views Oct 14Oct 22
  • post views
  • 4 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 1,112

Maximum: 1,479 views. Data as of Oct 22.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.6%

View-based engagement is below normal for a channel of this size. It may be explained by the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel's data has been collected once — the chart will appear after the next update.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 540–770 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1.

Without an ad label: 1 post.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @VPNTM

Is the channel clean? What does the purity index show?

The purity index is 89 out of 100, grade A, level “metrics are normal.” Among the deviations in the data, low post reach and spam in comments from outside accounts are visible.

What share of subscribers sees a post in @VPNTM?

ERR is about 2.6%: a post is seen by a small share of the subscriber base. The median views are about 1.1 thousand.

Is it worth placing ads here?

The advisability of placement is marked as questionable. The reason is reach: posts are seen by a small share of subscribers.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-22
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @VPNTM assessment dated 2026-10-22 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 42,396 subscribers, median post views were 1,112, ERR was 2.6%, and the cleanliness index was 89/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.