TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @notypicmarketing

@notypicmarketing: statistics and cleanliness index

ок, согласовано

Истории из маркетинга, медиа и SMM, заслуживающие вашего внимания. По рекламе: @justcage Предложка: @notypicalmarketing_bot Работаем с @bidfox_news, @Tgpodbor_official, @swaymedia, @Spiral_Yuri РКН: https://clck.ru/3GhxTN @alfapolo

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-17
Subscribers
342,555
Median views
8,609
ERR
2.5%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Marketing & PR
Post language Russian
Channel age 5 years

Data from 2026-09-17 — 22 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel is free from artificial boosting, but suffers from severe audience burnout: with 342 thousand subscribers, posts gather a median of only 8.6 thousand views, and over 10 thousand people unsubscribed in the last month. The situation is aggravated by a high posting frequency — with 20 posts per day, an ad post will be pushed out of sight within a matter of hours.

Buying ads here is questionable: you will be paying for the status of a large resource while getting the returns of a small niche blog.

What to pay attention to

Low Reach: ERR ≈ 2.5%

View engagement is below normal for a channel of this size. It might be due to the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 18 Marketing & PR catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 9 to 652,998 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 15 of 18
@notypicmarketing 2.5%
similar channels median 11.9%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 10 of 15
@notypicmarketing 0.98
similar channels median 2.13

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 15 to Sep 17. The dashed line is the median (8,609).

05.4K11KSep 15: 9,612 viewsSep 15: 8,195 viewsSep 15: 8,533 viewsSep 15: 8,364 viewsSep 15: 8,670 viewsSep 15: 8,133 viewsSep 15: 9,402 viewsSep 15: 9,441 viewsSep 15: 8,371 viewsSep 15: 8,749 viewsSep 15: 9,114 viewsSep 15: 9,073 viewsSep 15: 8,150 viewsSep 15: 8,006 viewsSep 15: 7,854 viewsSep 15: 7,984 viewsSep 15: 7,959 viewsSep 15: 8,363 viewsSep 15: 10,248 viewsSep 15: 10,792 viewsSep 16: 9,741 viewsSep 16: 9,820 viewsSep 16: 9,763 viewsSep 16: 9,473 viewsSep 16: 9,297 viewsSep 16: 9,124 viewsSep 16: 9,057 viewsSep 16: 9,094 viewsSep 16: 9,247 viewsSep 16: 8,396 viewsSep 16: 7,879 viewsSep 16: 7,527 viewsSep 16: 8,059 viewsSep 16: 8,349 viewsSep 16: 8,549 viewsSep 16: 8,683 viewsSep 16: 9,930 viewsSep 17: 5,836 viewsSep 17: 3,639 viewsSep 17: 3,778 views Sep 15Sep 17
  • post views
  • 10 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 8,609

Maximum: 10,792 views. Data as of Sep 17.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Low Reach: ERR ≈ 2.5%

View engagement is below normal for a channel of this size. It might be due to the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 11: index 76, grade BJun 11Aug 15: index 76, grade BAug 15Sep 17: index 81, grade ASep 17

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 8,032–9,350 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 4 more are too fresh.

Without an ad label: 3 posts.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @notypicmarketing

Is there artificial audience boosting on the channel?

Risk indicators are low (19 out of 100), views and reactions look natural, and no signs of botting were detected.

How many views will an ad get?

You should aim for a median of 8.6 thousand views. This is only 2.5% of the channel's entire audience, and due to frequent posting, views are mostly accumulated in the first hours.

Why is running ads considered questionable?

The reason is weak reach: only a small fraction of the subscriber base is active, and the channel itself is consistently losing readers. The return on investment may not justify the pricing of a large blog.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-17
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @notypicmarketing assessment dated 2026-09-17 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 342,555 subscribers, median post views were 8,609, ERR was 2.5%, and the cleanliness index was 81/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.