Assessment summary
Median reach is nearly three times higher than the subscriber count with zero reposts, which usually indicates view boosting or attracting unstable clickbait traffic. Combined with the deletion of approximately 89% of publications and extremely infrequent posting, the feed looks abandoned, putting the advertiser at risk of not getting the expected return on placement.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-08-26
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @mskchpa assessment dated 2026-08-26 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 6,209 subscribers, median post views were 16,913, ERR was 272.4%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
Posts are published rarely, which makes advertising reach harder to predict.
Estimated 48-hour reach: 8,457–20,244 views.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts were found among the latest 40 posts, so there is nothing to compare.
What grade D means
The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.
What to pay attention to
Views exceed what is reasonable for the base: ERR ≈ 272%
Median views significantly exceed the subscriber count (this is the median across half of the posts, not a single viral post). Without massive reposts, this indicates probable view boosting or clickbait traffic.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 22 to Aug 18. The dashed line is the median (16,913).
- post views
- median 16,913
The sample maximum is 30,373 views. Snapshot dated Aug 26; the axis is not clipped, so spikes remain visible.
What scoring found in the view pattern
Views exceed what is reasonable for the base: ERR ≈ 272%
Median views significantly exceed the subscriber count (this is the median across half of the posts, not a single viral post). Without massive reposts, this indicates probable view boosting or clickbait traffic.
What could not be calculated
View maturation was not assessed: at the time of the check, the channel had no posts newer than one day to compare with older posts.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once, so there is nothing to compare yet. The chart will appear after another check.
This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-26. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.
Buy advertising
The channel does not appear to be in the high-risk zone. These marketplaces provide channel catalogs, pricing, and payment on their own platforms.
TG Inspector does not sell placements or participate in the transaction. A specific channel may be absent from a marketplace.
Monitor this channel
Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.
Monitor @mskchpaQuestions about @mskchpa
What risk level is assigned to this channel?
The channel received a moderate risk score of 50/100 due to abnormally high reach relative to its subscriber base and mass deletion of old posts.
Why does post reach exceed the number of subscribers?
Median views (ERR around 272%) are significantly higher than the channel's audience, which, in the absence of reposts, points to potential view boosting or external seeding.
Is it advisable to advertise on this channel?
Placement is marked as questionable due to the author's extremely low activity: posts appear at a rate of 0.1 posts per day, and the latest post was published more than a week ago.
Similar channels in News
- 100 · A+
- 99 · A+
- 81 · A
- 81 · A
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
Other checked channels
This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.