TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @martachistilina

Fake engagement check for @martachistilina

Марта Чистилина о бизнесе на маркетплейсах | WB и Ozon — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-07-09.

Сопровождаю селлеров, настраиваю лучшую рекламу Чат помощи https://t.me/Martaprowaldberries № 4787313914 По рекламе @marta_chistilina

90/100
cleanliness index
Grade A
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
9561
Median views
415
ERR
4.3%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Business

Evidence snapshot

The @martachistilina assessment dated 2026-07-09 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 9,561 subscribers, median post views were 415, ERR was 4.3%, and the cleanliness index was 90/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

A small share of subscribers sees each post, limiting likely advertising reach.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 192–218 views.

What grade A means

The channel looks clean in the available public data. The remaining uncertainty comes from the limits of public Telegram metrics.

Run a fresh check for @martachistilina

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-07-09. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @martachistilina

Questions about @martachistilina

What does grade A mean for @martachistilina?

The channel looks clean in the available public data. The remaining uncertainty comes from the limits of public Telegram metrics.

What is the ERR of @martachistilina?

ERR is 4.3%. Median post views equal 4.3% of the channel's 9,561 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 90/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @martachistilina