TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @mama_nastenka

Fake engagement check for @mama_nastenka

Многодетная и не только — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-07.

Сотрудничество @mama_nastena (ePn). YMReferral По Perfluence https://clck.ru/3Q8dqx https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67bf132195951d1fbf11eb49

55/100
cleanliness index
Grade C
some signals require caution
Subscribers
58493
Median views
49461
ERR
84.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Lifestyle

Evidence snapshot

The @mama_nastenka assessment dated 2026-08-07 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 58,493 subscribers, median post views were 49,461, ERR was 84.6%, and the cleanliness index was 55/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The recommendation is limited by manipulation risk: some views may be artificial.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 48,868–49,344 views.

What grade C means

Several metrics require caution. They may indicate partially manipulated views or a passive audience, so advertising should be evaluated carefully.

Run a fresh check for @mama_nastenka

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-07. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @mama_nastenka

Questions about @mama_nastenka

What does grade C mean for @mama_nastenka?

Several metrics require caution. They may indicate partially manipulated views or a passive audience, so advertising should be evaluated carefully.

What is the ERR of @mama_nastenka?

ERR is 84.6%. Median post views equal 84.6% of the channel's 58,493 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 55/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @mama_nastenka