ВК по укладки париков :https://vk.com/club226713949 ВК группа :https://vk.com/club226535280
checked 2026-09-09
- Subscribers
- 390
- Median views
- 177
- ERR
- 45.4%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
The channel is a cosplayer's personal microblog with an active and engaged audience: for 390 subscribers, the median is 177 views, and posts regularly gather reactions and comments. The main limitation for an advertiser is the modest absolute scale of reach and the deletion of about 29% of publications, which is typical for clearing out temporary personal notes. Placement makes sense primarily for targeted offers in the cosplay, crafting, and geek culture niche.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 6 checked Hobbies & Activities channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 143 to 493 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-09
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @kaleri23 assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 390 subscribers, median post views were 177, ERR was 45.4%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: reasonable.
Not enough posts for a forecast.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts among the latest 40.
What grade A+ means
Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 29 to Sep 9. The dashed line is the median (177).
- post views
- 3 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 177
Maximum: 320 views. Data as of Sep 9.
No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Forwarding links
@kaleri23 forwards posts from
- @pikmiphoto_1 check in the botcheck
@lollycos
- @urocos check in the botcheck
@kaleri23's posts are forwarded by
Only among channels we have checked.
Data from 2026-09-09 — 11 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @kaleri23 and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @kaleri23Questions about @kaleri23
Are there any signs of audience manipulation on the channel?
The deterministic check showed a zero risk score (0 out of 100): views are stable, reactions are active, and no obvious signs of bots or artificial manipulation were detected.
What reach can be expected from a publication?
The median reach of a single post is about 177 views, which corresponds to a high level of engagement (ERR over 45%) for an audience of 390 subscribers.
Is buying advertising on this blog justified?
Placement is considered justified thanks to a clean organic audience and open comments; however, it is suitable only for projects aimed at narrow niche exposure rather than mass traffic.
Similar channels in Hobbies & Activities
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 99 · A+
- 98 · A+
All channels in Hobbies & Activities
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.