TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @lollycos

Fake engagement check for @lollycos

кладбище лолли — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-09.

кофеманка, косплеер и просто Лолли __________________________________________ пост- знакомство: https://t.me/lollylaloly19/5561 отправить анонимное сообщение: http://t.me/askifybot?start=r8ppb

Grade A+ low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-09
Subscribers
140
Median views
215
ERR
153.6%
Posts sampled
40

Assessment summary

For a personal cosplay feed, views exceeding the subscriber count are more likely driven by forwards and external interest in individual photo works rather than uniform artificial reach. Infrequent posting gives a placement prolonged visibility, but the wide variance in views and the deletion of a noticeable share of posts make individual post performance less predictable; the channel is primarily suitable for a niche cosplay audience and related products or events.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 9 checked Art & Design channels with no visible signs of manipulation. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 36 to 164,419 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 7 of 9
153.6% for @lollycos similar channels median: 91.7%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 5 of 9
2.52 for @lollycos similar channels median: 2.56

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-09
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @lollycos assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 140 subscribers, median post views were 215, ERR was 153.6%, and the cleanliness index was 98/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

What grade A+ means

Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from May 17 to Sep 6. The dashed line is the median (215).

07101.4KMay 17: 238 viewsMay 22: 176 viewsMay 26: 184 viewsMay 27: 249 viewsJun 6: 278 viewsJun 6: 233 viewsJun 6: 278 viewsJun 9: 262 viewsJun 21: 213 viewsJun 27: 201 viewsJun 27: 220 viewsJul 13: 128 viewsJul 16: 100 viewsJul 16: 165 viewsJul 16: 251 viewsJul 16: 250 viewsJul 31: 232 viewsJul 31: 256 viewsAug 21: 237 viewsAug 21: 251 viewsAug 21: 225 viewsAug 21: 229 viewsAug 21: 226 viewsAug 21: 218 viewsAug 21: 217 viewsAug 21: 205 viewsAug 21: 201 viewsAug 27: 121 viewsAug 27: 137 viewsAug 31: 1,414 viewsAug 31: 1,420 viewsSep 2: 109 viewsSep 5: 71 viewsSep 6: 35 viewsSep 6: 35 viewsSep 6: 35 viewsSep 6: 34 viewsSep 6: 34 viewsSep 6: 49 viewsSep 6: 49 views May 17Sep 6

Maximum: 1,420 views. Data as of Sep 9.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

@lollycos forwards posts from

@lollycos's posts are forwarded by

Only among channels we have checked.

Check today: @lollycos

Data from 2026-09-09 — 11 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @lollycos and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @lollycos

Questions about @lollycos

What is the outcome of the fraud check?

The overall risk is low: 2 out of 100, green status. The check found no obvious signs of manipulation, but assessment confidence is low due to the small subscriber base.

What reach does the channel get?

The median reach is 215 views, which is higher than the base of 140 subscribers. Views vary significantly between posts, so an individual post may gather noticeably more or less than the median level.

Is the channel suitable for advertising?

Placement is marked as justified. The feed posts infrequently, so an ad post should not get pushed down quickly, but there is no data on the reach of past ad placements in the sample.

Similar channels in Art & Design

All channels in Art & Design

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @lollycos