кофеманка, косплеер и просто Лолли __________________________________________ пост- знакомство: https://t.me/lollylaloly19/5561 отправить анонимное сообщение: http://t.me/askifybot?start=r8ppb
checked 2026-09-09
- Subscribers
- 140
- Median views
- 215
- ERR
- 153.6%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
For a personal cosplay feed, views exceeding the subscriber count are more likely driven by forwards and external interest in individual photo works rather than uniform artificial reach. Infrequent posting gives a placement prolonged visibility, but the wide variance in views and the deletion of a noticeable share of posts make individual post performance less predictable; the channel is primarily suitable for a niche cosplay audience and related products or events.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 9 checked Art & Design channels with no visible signs of manipulation. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 36 to 164,419 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-09
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @lollycos assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 140 subscribers, median post views were 215, ERR was 153.6%, and the cleanliness index was 98/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: reasonable.
Not enough posts for a forecast.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts among the latest 40.
What grade A+ means
Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from May 17 to Sep 6. The dashed line is the median (215).
- post views
- median 215
Maximum: 1,420 views. Data as of Sep 9.
What could not be calculated
View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Forwarding links
@lollycos forwards posts from
@ari_stripe
mutual- @lagunakotaru check in the botcheck
- @sashadairu check in the botcheck
- @vinchesteri check in the botcheck
@lollycos's posts are forwarded by
Only among channels we have checked.
@ari_stripe
mutual
@kaleri23
Data from 2026-09-09 — 11 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @lollycos and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @lollycosQuestions about @lollycos
What is the outcome of the fraud check?
The overall risk is low: 2 out of 100, green status. The check found no obvious signs of manipulation, but assessment confidence is low due to the small subscriber base.
What reach does the channel get?
The median reach is 215 views, which is higher than the base of 140 subscribers. Views vary significantly between posts, so an individual post may gather noticeably more or less than the median level.
Is the channel suitable for advertising?
Placement is marked as justified. The feed posts infrequently, so an ad post should not get pushed down quickly, but there is no data on the reach of past ad placements in the sample.
Similar channels in Art & Design
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.