TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @Hazels_Notes

Fake engagement check for @Hazels_Notes

Записки Хэйзел ✨ — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-09.

Во мне несколько личностей, и у каждой из них своё увлечение ♡

Grade A+ low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-09
Subscribers
84
Median views
47
ERR
56.0%
Posts sampled
40

Assessment summary

The channel is a personal micro-diary about cosplay and crafting with no signs of inflation; however, 57% of reposts in the feed and a median of only 47 views make placing commercial ads debatable. With an audience of 84 subscribers, a publication will not provide tangible reach, even despite the activity of regular readers.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 6 checked Hobbies & Activities channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 64 to 241 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 5 of 6
56% for @Hazels_Notes similar channels median: 82%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 6 of 6
5.04 for @Hazels_Notes similar channels median: 8.03

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-09
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @Hazels_Notes assessment dated 2026-09-09 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 84 subscribers, median post views were 47, ERR was 56.0%, and the cleanliness index was 99/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Mostly reposts and weak reach — little audience of its own.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1. 1 more are too fresh.

What grade A+ means

Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 28 to Sep 9. The dashed line is the median (47).

080161Aug 28: 59 viewsAug 28: 57 viewsAug 28: 68 viewsAug 30: 41 viewsAug 30: 54 viewsAug 30: 38 viewsAug 30: 46 viewsAug 30: 48 viewsAug 30: 148 viewsAug 30: 161 viewsAug 30: 151 viewsAug 30: 132 viewsAug 30: 65 viewsAug 31: 57 viewsAug 31: 139 viewsSep 2: 46 viewsSep 5: 46 viewsSep 5: 49 viewsSep 5: 45 viewsSep 5: 46 viewsSep 5: 44 viewsSep 5: 45 viewsSep 5: 42 viewsSep 5: 44 viewsSep 5: 52 viewsSep 5: 51 viewsSep 5: 51 viewsSep 5: 50 viewsSep 5: 50 viewsSep 5: 55 viewsSep 5: 51 viewsSep 6: 45 viewsSep 6: 45 viewsSep 6: 45 viewsSep 6: 46 viewsSep 6: 44 viewsSep 8: 27 viewsSep 8: 33 viewsSep 8: 22 viewsSep 9: 24 views Aug 28Sep 9

Maximum: 161 views. Data as of Sep 9.

No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

@Hazels_Notes forwards posts from

@Hazels_Notes's posts are forwarded by

Only among channels we have checked.

Check today: @Hazels_Notes

Data from 2026-09-09 — 11 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @Hazels_Notes and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @Hazels_Notes

Questions about @Hazels_Notes

Are there any signs of subscriber or view inflation on the channel?

No, the risk score is 1/100, and reactions along with the natural variation of views confirm an active, albeit small, audience.

What is the actual reach of the publications?

On average, a post receives about 47 views, which corresponds to a high engagement rate for a base of 84 subscribers, but is modest in absolute numbers.

Why is placing ads on the channel considered debatable?

More than half of the content consists of external reposts, and the absolute reach is too small to achieve a cost-effective result from advertising.

Similar channels in Hobbies & Activities

All channels in Hobbies & Activities

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @Hazels_Notes