TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @itsdanilevskaya

Fake engagement check for @itsdanilevskaya

Mon Amy — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-24.

Любое мнение на этом канале может стать неактуальным через минуту после публикации. С любовью, Эмилия Данилевская. itsdanilevskaya@mail.ru

94/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
52862
Median views
32947
ERR
62.3%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Lifestyle

Evidence snapshot

The @itsdanilevskaya assessment dated 2026-08-24 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 52,862 subscribers, median post views were 32,947, ERR was 62.3%, and the cleanliness index was 94/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 22,843–31,772 views.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @itsdanilevskaya

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-24. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @itsdanilevskaya

Questions about @itsdanilevskaya

What does grade A+ mean for @itsdanilevskaya?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @itsdanilevskaya?

ERR is 62.3%. Median post views equal 62.3% of the channel's 52,862 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 94/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@redbictt1@mukhinss@wildberriestov5

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @itsdanilevskaya