не берите мои стики в свои стикерпаки пожалуйста-
Assessment summary
Views exceeding the subscriber count with a median of 3.3 thousand is explained by the virality of the author's content: the artist's works and stickers are actively forwarded to external chats and third-party platforms. The feed is barely spammed with ads (only 2% in the sample) and maintains open comments with a lively response. For an advertiser, this is a lucrative platform for youth and creative products, though the integration format should be adapted to the blog's specific authorial style.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-08-26
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @infokrasot assessment dated 2026-08-26 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,371 subscribers, median post views were 3,283, ERR was 239.5%, and the cleanliness index was 95/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: reasonable.
Estimated 48-hour reach: 2,807–2,897 views.
Reach of advertising posts
Only 1 advertising posts qualify for the calculation, which is not enough for a median.
What grade A+ means
The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.
What to pay attention to
High reach due to external forwards: ERR ≈ 239%
Views exceed the subscriber base, but this appears to be organic rather than inflated: views fluctuate noticeably from post to post, and reactions are genuine. Typical for content that is actively reposted to external chats (work groups, aggregators) or goes viral outside the channel.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 6 to Aug 26. The dashed line is the median (3,283).
- post views
- 3 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 3,283
The sample maximum is 4,515 views. Snapshot dated Aug 26; the axis is not clipped, so spikes remain visible.
What scoring found in the view pattern
High reach due to external forwards: ERR ≈ 239%
Views exceed the subscriber base, but this appears to be organic rather than inflated: views fluctuate noticeably from post to post, and reactions are genuine. Typical for content that is actively reposted to external chats (work groups, aggregators) or goes viral outside the channel.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once, so there is nothing to compare yet. The chart will appear after another check.
This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-26. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.
Buy advertising
The channel does not appear to be in the high-risk zone. These marketplaces provide channel catalogs, pricing, and payment on their own platforms.
TG Inspector does not sell placements or participate in the transaction. A specific channel may be absent from a marketplace.
Monitor this channel
Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.
Monitor @infokrasotQuestions about @infokrasot
Why does post reach exceed the number of subscribers?
Median views reach 3.3 thousand with 1.3 thousand subscribers due to the virality of custom stickers and regular reposts of content to third-party chats. The analysis confirms the natural character of such traffic without signs of manipulation.
Is the channel suitable for buying ads?
Yes, ad placement is considered justified, and the risk score is only 5 out of 100. The channel is updated regularly (about 2 posts per day), is not overloaded with third-party integrations, and has open comments.
What performance metrics should you focus on?
Posts consistently gather around 3.3 thousand views with stable variance (CV 0.19). At the same time, it is important for the advertiser to consider the content's niche focus on a youth and creative audience.
Similar channels in Entertainment
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 99 · A+
- 99 · A+
- 96 · A+
- 50 · D
Other checked channels
This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.