TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @infokrasot

Fake engagement check for @infokrasot

˳༙༙𐇽ۣ۪۫࣫𝀝݄ ꙰⃪𝆋𐇽࡙⃜᪾࿙๋۪░⃪⃨᛫᪶᪵᪸᪵᪳᪱࣫ — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-26.

не берите мои стики в свои стикерпаки пожалуйста-

95/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
1371
Median views
3283
ERR
239.5%
Posts sampled
40

Assessment summary

Views exceeding the subscriber count with a median of 3.3 thousand is explained by the virality of the author's content: the artist's works and stickers are actively forwarded to external chats and third-party platforms. The feed is barely spammed with ads (only 2% in the sample) and maintains open comments with a lively response. For an advertiser, this is a lucrative platform for youth and creative products, though the integration format should be adapted to the blog's specific authorial style.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-08-26
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @infokrasot assessment dated 2026-08-26 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,371 subscribers, median post views were 3,283, ERR was 239.5%, and the cleanliness index was 95/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 2,807–2,897 views.

Reach of advertising posts

Only 1 advertising posts qualify for the calculation, which is not enough for a median.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What to pay attention to

High reach due to external forwards: ERR ≈ 239%

Views exceed the subscriber base, but this appears to be organic rather than inflated: views fluctuate noticeably from post to post, and reactions are genuine. Typical for content that is actively reposted to external chats (work groups, aggregators) or goes viral outside the channel.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 6 to Aug 26. The dashed line is the median (3,283).

02.3K4.5KAug 6: 2,851 viewsAug 6: 2,832 viewsAug 6: 2,833 viewsAug 6: 2,982 viewsAug 6: 3,007 viewsAug 6: 3,023 viewsAug 6: 3,045 viewsAug 6: 3,114 viewsAug 6: 3,124 viewsAug 6: 3,145 viewsAug 7: 3,079 viewsAug 7: 3,101 viewsAug 7: 3,321 viewsAug 8: 3,307 viewsAug 8: 3,394 viewsAug 8: 3,260 viewsAug 8: 3,422 viewsAug 8: 3,381 viewsAug 8: 3,134 viewsAug 8: 3,450 viewsAug 8: 3,552 viewsAug 8: 3,504 viewsAug 8: 3,664 viewsAug 9: 3,846 viewsAug 9: 3,853 viewsAug 9: 3,872 viewsAug 10: 4,053 viewsAug 10: 4,204 viewsAug 10: 4,299 viewsAug 10: 4,395 viewsAug 10: 4,515 viewsAug 17: 3,849 viewsAug 17: 4,045 viewsAug 18: 3,778 viewsAug 22: 3,176 viewsAug 24: 2,897 viewsAug 24: 2,913 viewsAug 25: 2,813 viewsAug 25: 2,807 viewsAug 26: 804 views Aug 6Aug 26

The sample maximum is 4,515 views. Snapshot dated Aug 26; the axis is not clipped, so spikes remain visible.

What scoring found in the view pattern

High reach due to external forwards: ERR ≈ 239%

Views exceed the subscriber base, but this appears to be organic rather than inflated: views fluctuate noticeably from post to post, and reactions are genuine. Typical for content that is actively reposted to external chats (work groups, aggregators) or goes viral outside the channel.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once, so there is nothing to compare yet. The chart will appear after another check.

Run a fresh check for @infokrasot

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-26. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Buy advertising

The channel does not appear to be in the high-risk zone. These marketplaces provide channel catalogs, pricing, and payment on their own platforms.

TG Inspector does not sell placements or participate in the transaction. A specific channel may be absent from a marketplace.

These are affiliate links: TG Inspector may receive a commission. This does not affect the cleanliness index.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @infokrasot

Questions about @infokrasot

Why does post reach exceed the number of subscribers?

Median views reach 3.3 thousand with 1.3 thousand subscribers due to the virality of custom stickers and regular reposts of content to third-party chats. The analysis confirms the natural character of such traffic without signs of manipulation.

Is the channel suitable for buying ads?

Yes, ad placement is considered justified, and the risk score is only 5 out of 100. The channel is updated regularly (about 2 posts per day), is not overloaded with third-party integrations, and has open comments.

What performance metrics should you focus on?

Posts consistently gather around 3.3 thousand views with stable variance (CV 0.19). At the same time, it is important for the advertiser to consider the content's niche focus on a youth and creative audience.

Similar channels in Entertainment

All channels in Entertainment

Other checked channels

@mskchpa@onlineodds1@realmadrid_aficcionados@binanceredpacket_code@earn_tips@sky_sports_football_updates@pavlovstars@crypto_scalp_signals@adsgram_ai@tradingkattadubai@xdrawking09@primer_league_match_goal

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @infokrasot