Кр 3 авы @krivdabeska Слава Богу ГЕНЕРАЛ 🙏🤍🤎СЛАВА ГЕНЕРАЛУ🙏🤍🤎АНГЕЛА ХРАНИТЕЛЯ ГЕНЕРАЛА КАЖДОМУ ИЗ ВАС🙏🤍🤎БОЖЕ ХРАНИ ГЕНЕРАЛА 🙏🤍🤎СПАСИБО ВАМ НАШИ СОЗДАТЕЛИ ГЕНЕРАЛА🙏🤍🤎ХРАНИ ГЕНЕРАЛА ✊ http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=arjdV3JyToUKN5i
checked 2026-09-07
- Subscribers
- 36
- Median views
- 33
- ERR
- 91.7%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
The channel is an author micro-community dedicated to fan art, where almost the entire base of 36 subscribers regularly views posts, generating an organic reach of over 91%. There is no risk of artificial boosting; however, with a median of just 33 views, integration makes sense primarily for targeted collaborations within a specific gaming fandom.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 9 checked Art & Design channels with no visible signs of manipulation. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 48 to 164,419 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-07
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @purpurscave assessment dated 2026-09-07 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 36 subscribers, median post views were 33, ERR was 91.7%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: reasonable.
Not enough posts for a forecast.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts among the latest 40.
What grade A+ means
Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Jul 28 to Sep 7. The dashed line is the median (33).
- post views
- 2 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 33
Maximum: 124 views. Data as of Sep 7.
No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-09-07 — 13 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @purpurscave and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @purpurscaveQuestions about @purpurscave
Is it safe to advertise on this channel?
The channel's risk score is 0 out of 100, and no artificial boosting was detected. However, the subscriber base is only 36 subscribers, so statistical confidence in the analysis is low.
What reach will an advertising post get?
The median reach is 33 views per post. At 1 post per day, the post will not get lost in the feed, but the audience is limited by the size of the microblog.
Is buying ads on this channel justified?
Ad placement is considered justified due to completely clean audience engagement metrics. At the same time, the publication is primarily suitable for niche projects within the channel's theme.
Similar channels in Art & Design
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 99 · A+
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.