Bitch, kiss my ass, bitch, kiss my ass, bitch, kiss my ass, b-b-bitch, kiss my ass Bitch, kiss my ass, bitch, kiss my ass, bitch, kiss my ass and bitch, kiss my ass Bitch, kiss my ass, bitch, kiss my ass, bitch, kiss my ass, b-b-bitch, kiss my ass Bitch,
checked 2026-09-10
- Subscribers
- 550
- Median views
- 122
- ERR
- 22.2%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
With a small base of 550 subscribers and the regular deletion of more than half of the posts (52%), reach metrics may be partially artificial. A median of 122 views provides an extremely low reach for commercial integrations, while the nature of a personal blog with frequent feed cleanups creates a risk of premature post removal.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 9 checked Blogs channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 184 to 1,429 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-10
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @davidinsta assessment dated 2026-09-10 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 550 subscribers, median post views were 122, ERR was 22.2%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
Some of the views may be fake.
Not enough posts for a forecast.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts among the latest 40.
What grade D means
Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.
What to pay attention to
It seems some posts have been deleted (≈52% gaps in numbering)
There are many gaps in the numbering of recent posts — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide finished ad posts and conceal their actual reach. On its own, this is an indirect sign (posts are also deleted during edits).
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 31 to Sep 9. The dashed line is the median (122).
- post views
- 8 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 122
Maximum: 141 views. Data as of Sep 10.
No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-09-10 — 10 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @davidinsta and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @davidinstaQuestions about @davidinsta
What risk level was identified for the channel?
The channel received a risk score of 50 out of 100 (yellow zone), indicating a medium risk and the possibility of partially inflated views.
What reach does a post get?
The median reach is about 122 views per post with an ERR of 22.18%; however, due to the small sample size and subscriber base, confidence in the stability of metrics is low.
Is it advisable to buy ads here?
Placement is considered questionable: there is a risk of artificially generated views, and the absolute audience reach is too small for most advertising objectives.
Similar channels in Blogs
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.