здесь я высираю мысли в 3 ночи когда спать не получается а жить не хочется
checked 2026-09-17
- Subscribers
- 132
- Median views
- 1,000
- ERR
- 757.6%
- Posts sampled
- 6
Little data, so this is a rough estimate.
Assessment summary
On a channel with 132 subscribers, posts get about a thousand views, and over 1,700 messages have been deleted from the history. Such abnormal reach, combined with clearing the feed and closed comments, makes it impossible to determine the real audience size: this could be viral reposts of personal content or test view boosting.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 11 checked Blogs channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 44 to 304 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-17
- Sample
- The latest 6 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @chernoviqotebe assessment dated 2026-09-17 uses 6 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 132 subscribers, median post views were 1,000, ERR was 757.6%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
Too few posts to judge the return on an ad.
Not enough posts for a forecast.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts among the latest 6.
What grade D means
Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.
What to pay attention to
Older posts have fewer views than recent ones (×0.41)
Views on older posts are lower than 24-hour views, which is atypical for organic post maturation. Possible view boosting on recent posts or sharp traffic fluctuations. Caveat: there is only 1 24-hour post in the sample, which is not enough to judge the channel; this observation is considered weak.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 6 posts with views, from May 22 to Sep 17. The dashed line is the median (1,000).
- post views
- 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 1,000
Maximum: 3,530 views. Data as of Sep 17.
What scoring found in the view pattern
Older posts have fewer views than recent ones (×0.41)
Views on older posts are lower than 24-hour views, which is atypical for organic post maturation. Possible view boosting on recent posts or sharp traffic fluctuations. Caveat: there is only 1 24-hour post in the sample, which is not enough to judge the channel; this observation is considered weak.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-09-17 — 3 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @chernoviqotebe and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @chernoviqotebeQuestions about @chernoviqotebe
What is the channel's risk of inflation?
The risk is assessed as medium (50 out of 100), but check confidence is low due to a small sample of only six posts.
Why is post reach higher than the subscriber count?
The median view count is 1,000 with 132 subscribers, giving a reach of over 750%. This points either to an external influx of traffic from forwards or to artificial view boosting.
Is buying ads justified?
Placement is marked as questionable: there are too few posts in the feed for reliable analysis, and the channel's past history has been almost completely erased.
Similar channels in Blogs
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.