TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @Cards_bots

@Cards_bots: statistics and cleanliness index

Карточные боты

Владелец - @sleimor

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-04
Subscribers
70,444
Median views
237,140
ERR
336.6%
Posts sampled
29
Niche Video Games
Post language Russian
Channel age 2 years

Data from 2026-10-04 — 5 days old.

Assessment summary

Update announcements and launches of interactive card bots for games and anime.

The channel has not been updated for over six months, and the audience has shrunk by more than 6,000 subscribers over the past three months. At the same time, views are more than triple the subscriber count: ERR of 336.6% compared to 27.6% across 14 similar channels in the catalog, and some messages have been deleted (around 57% of IDs are missing). In an inactive feed, a new post is unlikely to attract an audience.

What to pay attention to

Views exceed subscribers: ERR ≈ 337%

Median views are noticeably higher than the subscriber count across half of the posts, rather than from a single viral post. This happens when posts spread beyond the channel via forwards, chats, or external traffic, but other metrics do not support this version.

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 15 Video Games catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 25,681 to 181,254 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 15 of 15
@Cards_bots 336.6%
similar channels median 31.5%

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 29 posts with views, from Nov 8 to Apr 1. The dashed line is the median (237,140).

0244K488KNov 8: 408,968 viewsNov 10: 440,380 viewsNov 17: 363,775 viewsNov 20: 299,104 viewsNov 20: 275,459 viewsNov 21: 223,901 viewsNov 22: 186,387 viewsNov 22: 224,631 viewsNov 23: 231,430 viewsNov 24: 237,140 viewsNov 24: 260,364 viewsNov 28: 238,871 viewsNov 29: 229,628 viewsDec 1: 232,431 viewsDec 4: 310,261 viewsDec 6: 215,143 viewsDec 8: 237,358 viewsDec 12: 246,932 viewsDec 18: 222,999 viewsDec 20: 220,378 viewsDec 23: 232,418 viewsDec 27: 354,545 viewsDec 29: 449,889 viewsDec 31: 488,063 viewsFeb 4: 475,659 viewsAug 11: 168,085 viewsFeb 26: 57,408 viewsMar 6: 60,028 viewsApr 1: 45,922 views Nov 8Apr 1
  • post views
  • median 237,140

Maximum: 488,063 views. Data as of Oct 4.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views exceed subscribers: ERR ≈ 337%

Median views are noticeably higher than the subscriber count across half of the posts, rather than from a single viral post. This happens when posts spread beyond the channel via forwards, chats, or external traffic, but other metrics do not support this version.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

4 checks for this channel.

050100Jul 5: index 42, grade DJul 5Aug 21: index 42, grade DAug 21Sep 22: index 48, grade DSep 22Oct 4: index 50, grade DOct 4

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

The channel has gone quiet — ask the owner when the next post is due.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 1.

Without an ad label: 1 post.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @Cards_bots

What is the integrity score of the @Cards_bots channel?

The integrity score is 50 out of 100 (grade D, 'has deviations' level). The rating was affected by the deletion of some messages (around 57% of IDs are missing) and views exceeding the subscriber count by more than three times.

Why are post views higher than the subscriber count?

Median views reach 237,140 with 70,444 subscribers (ERR 336.6%), whereas similar channels in the catalog average around 27.6%. This pattern can occur with mass external forwards, but other channel metrics do not support this.

Is it advisable to buy ads on this channel?

Placing ads is considered questionable, as the channel is idle and the last publication was posted more than 180 days ago. Without regular content, it is difficult to rely on predictable audience reach.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-04
Sample
The latest 29 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @Cards_bots assessment dated 2026-10-04 uses 29 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 70,444 subscribers, median post views were 237,140, ERR was 336.6%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.