TG Inspector TG Inspector

Fake engagement check for @bywwoshop

Физ Н0мера |BywwoShop — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-06-23.

46/100
cleanliness index
Grade D
some signals require caution
Subscribers
8521
Median views
170839
ERR
2004.9%
Posts sampled
1
Niche
Technology

The sample is small, so this assessment is preliminary.

Evidence snapshot

The @bywwoshop assessment dated 2026-06-23 uses 1 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 8,521 subscribers, median post views were 170,839, ERR was 2004.9%, and the cleanliness index was 46/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

The channel carries a heavy advertising load, so another promotion may be lost in the feed.

Estimated 48-hour reach: about 145,213 views.

Low-confidence forecast because few posts were available.

What grade D means

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

Run a fresh check for @bywwoshop

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-06-23. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @bywwoshop

Questions about @bywwoshop

What does grade D mean for @bywwoshop?

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

What is the ERR of @bywwoshop?

ERR is 2004.9%. Median post views equal 2004.9% of the channel's 8,521 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 46/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @bywwoshop