TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @viviannru

Fake engagement check for @viviannru

Viviannru - Нейросети, Личный Блог — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-14.

телега.ин: https://telega.in/c/viviannru Нейросети, промпты, блог. - Делюсь своим опытом и результатами в нейросетях - Немного из личной жизни - Pr + лс + заказы: @viviannpr Поддержать автора: https://boosty.to/viviannru

100/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
36964
Median views
2922
ERR
7.9%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Technology

Evidence snapshot

The @viviannru assessment dated 2026-08-14 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 36,964 subscribers, median post views were 2,922, ERR was 7.9%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 1,179–1,654 views.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @viviannru

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-14. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @viviannru

Questions about @viviannru

What does grade A+ mean for @viviannru?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @viviannru?

ERR is 7.9%. Median post views equal 7.9% of the channel's 36,964 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 100/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @viviannru