Fake engagement check for @Bots_Directory
Bots Directory — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-28.
🤖 Best AI, utility & inline bots. Tested • Updated daily. Unofficial. Not affiliated with Telegram. 📢 Ads & Promotion @Advertise_on_Telegram telega.io/channels/Bots_Directory/card 🛡 DMCA / Legal ffylu23@gmail.com
Assessment summary
A high proportion of deleted publications (around 82%) combined with infrequent posting indicates a systematic feed cleanup, which often conceals the real performance of ad integrations. Direct publication of bots for boosting reactions and views further reinforces suspicions of artificial audience activity. For an advertiser, this poses a risk of overpaying for the reported median reach of 43.8k views and the likelihood of the post being quickly deleted from the channel.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-08-28
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @Bots_Directory assessment dated 2026-08-28 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 321,112 subscribers, median post views were 43,771, ERR was 13.6%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
The recommendation is limited by manipulation risk: some views may be artificial.
Estimated 48-hour reach: 21,886–43,772 views.
Reach of advertising posts
Only 1 advertising posts qualify for the calculation, which is not enough for a median.
What grade D means
The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.
What to pay attention to
Some posts seem to have been deleted (≈82% gaps in numbering)
There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide completed ad placements and conceal their actual reach. On its own, this is an indirect indicator (posts are also deleted during edits).
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Jan 8 to Aug 28. The dashed line is the median (43,771).
- post views
- 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 43,771
The sample maximum is 81,604 views. Snapshot dated Aug 28; the axis is not clipped, so spikes remain visible.
The view-dispersion and maturation signals were available and found no deviations. This is not a guarantee: use the complete cleanliness index.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once, so there is nothing to compare yet. The chart will appear after another check.
This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-28. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.
Buy advertising
The channel does not appear to be in the high-risk zone. These marketplaces provide channel catalogs, pricing, and payment on their own platforms.
TG Inspector does not sell placements or participate in the transaction. A specific channel may be absent from a marketplace.
Monitor this channel
Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.
Monitor @Bots_DirectoryQuestions about @Bots_Directory
What level of fraud risk has been identified for the channel?
The channel received a risk score of 50 out of 100 (medium risk level). The elevated score is due to the mass deletion of past publications and the risk of artificial view inflation.
What are the reach metrics for feed posts?
The median reach is 43,771 views with an ERR engagement rate of 13.63%. At the same time, new posts are published extremely rarely — on average once every 5 days.
Is it advisable to buy ads on this channel?
Placement is considered questionable due to potential view inflation and constant post deletion. When purchasing, it is important to secure guarantees in advance regarding the duration the ad post will remain in the feed.
Other checked channels
This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.