TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @andruxinv

Fake engagement check for @andruxinv

°™° — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-20.

Реклама/вопросы: @andruxinvest @fokicha @baffet_corp

100/100
cleanliness index
Grade A+
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
2360
Median views
849
ERR
36.0%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Cryptocurrency

Evidence snapshot

The @andruxinv assessment dated 2026-08-20 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 2,360 subscribers, median post views were 849, ERR was 36.0%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 74–147 views.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 374 views versus 920 for organic posts.

Based on 9 advertising and 30 organic posts older than two days.

What grade A+ means

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

Run a fresh check for @andruxinv

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-20. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @andruxinv

Questions about @andruxinv

What does grade A+ mean for @andruxinv?

The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.

What is the ERR of @andruxinv?

ERR is 36.0%. Median post views equal 36.0% of the channel's 2,360 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 100/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @andruxinv