TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @budni_temshik4

@budni_temshik4: statistics and cleanliness index

Стас | БУДНИ ТЕМЩИКА🥷

Делюсь своим опытом по заработку в интернете🤑 *Официальный YouTube канал: https://www.youtube.com/@stas_budni_temshik4 📌Реклама (тг) - @RedLineGrop — ❌ Курсы и обучение — НЕ продаю ❌ VIP-каналы — НЕ имею ❌ Первым — НЕ пишу

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-01
Subscribers
4,039
Median views
2,226
ERR
55.1%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Earnings
Post language Russian
Channel age 3 years

Data from 2026-10-01 — 7 days old.

Assessment summary

A YouTuber's personal blog about making money online, traffic arbitrage, and personal projects with photos and video announcements.

The channel publishes new content infrequently — averaging one post every five days, which keeps publications from getting lost in the feed and results in reaction engagement higher than that of most similar channels in the catalog.

What to pay attention to

Some messages have been deleted: ≈54% of IDs are missing

There are many gaps in the numbering of the channel's recent messages — some of them have been deleted. Message IDs are counted, not publications: each photo in an album has its own ID. Deleted posts are not visible, so the channel can only be partially evaluated based on the remaining ones.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 8 Earnings catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 134 to 293,527 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 5 of 8
@budni_temshik4 55.1%
similar channels median 65.9%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 5 of 8
@budni_temshik4 0.71
similar channels median 0.56

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Apr 4 to Sep 30. The dashed line is the median (2,226).

02.1K4.2KApr 4: 2,242 viewsApr 16: 1,937 viewsApr 18: 1,893 viewsApr 23: 1,663 viewsApr 26: 1,870 viewsApr 26: 1,678 viewsApr 28: 1,679 viewsMay 1: 2,022 viewsMay 2: 1,995 viewsMay 5: 2,103 viewsMay 7: 2,050 viewsMay 9: 2,570 viewsMay 13: 2,210 viewsMay 18: 2,279 viewsMay 19: 2,492 viewsMay 31: 1,905 viewsJun 2: 1,861 viewsJun 4: 2,114 viewsJun 10: 1,954 viewsJun 12: 2,098 viewsJun 14: 2,289 viewsJun 21: 2,265 viewsJun 27: 2,249 viewsJun 28: 2,638 viewsJul 4: 2,442 viewsJul 8: 2,871 viewsJul 12: 2,713 viewsJul 15: 3,822 viewsAug 4: 3,039 viewsAug 12: 3,832 viewsAug 23: 3,879 viewsAug 29: 3,839 viewsAug 29: 4,213 viewsSep 2: 3,024 viewsSep 4: 2,960 viewsSep 7: 2,957 viewsSep 14: 2,091 viewsSep 25: 1,529 viewsSep 28: 967 viewsSep 30: 628 views Apr 4Sep 30
  • post views
  • 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 2,226

Maximum: 4,213 views. Data as of Oct 1.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 15: index 95, grade A+Jun 15Sep 8: index 50, grade DSep 8Oct 1: index 91, grade A+Oct 1

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 1,496–2,992 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @budni_temshik4

Are there any suspicious anomalies with @budni_temshik4?

The channel's purity index is 91 out of 100 with an A+ grade, which corresponds to the 'metrics are normal' level. The only noted anomaly is missing about 54% of message IDs, which is usually related to the deletion of some posts or media files.

What reach does a post get in this channel?

The median reach is around 2226 views per post, covering more than half of the subscriber base (ERR 55.1%). View variance is moderate (0.32), and reactions are left more frequently than on similar niche channels from the catalog.

Is the channel suitable for advertising?

Ad placement feasibility is rated as 'justified'. There is no third-party advertising in the analyzed sample, and the low posting frequency allows an ad post to stay visible to readers longer.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-01
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @budni_temshik4 assessment dated 2026-10-01 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 4,039 subscribers, median post views were 2,226, ERR was 55.1%, and the cleanliness index was 91/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.