تنها ایدی معتبر و ادمین اصلی : @AskforMe
checked 2026-09-05
- Subscribers
- 35,527
- Median views
- 22,274
- ERR
- 62.7%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
An abnormally high reach of over 60%, combined with extremely rare posts and disabled comments, points to likely periodic view boosting on individual posts. The situation is further complicated by the deletion of 64% of publications from the channel feed, a tactic often used to mask traces of temporary view inflation or deleted ads. Placing ads here is questionable, as real audience activity is doubtful and the claimed reach risks being artificial.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 24 checked Computer science channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 12,461 to 87,103 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-05
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @ahwaz_hackerz assessment dated 2026-09-05 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 35,527 subscribers, median post views were 22,274, ERR was 62.7%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
Some of the views may be fake.
About 11,138–23,192 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
Too few advertising posts to compare: 2.
What grade D means
Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.
What to pay attention to
Some posts appear to have been deleted (≈64% gaps in numbering)
There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide completed ad campaigns and conceal their actual reach. On its own, this is an indirect indicator (posts are also deleted during edits).
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Dec 2 to Sep 2. The dashed line is the median (22,274).
- post views
- median 22,274
Maximum: 66,492 views. Data as of Sep 5.
What could not be calculated
View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-09-05 — 15 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @ahwaz_hackerz and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @ahwaz_hackerzQuestions about @ahwaz_hackerz
Is it safe to buy ads on this channel?
The advisability of ad placement is considered questionable: the risk score is 50 out of 100, and metrics indicate a likelihood of partial view boosting.
What explains the high post reach?
Median views reach 22.2 thousand with 35.5 thousand subscribers; however, with comments disabled and 64% of posts deleted, such numbers are highly likely to be generated artificially.
What are the main risks for an advertiser on this channel?
The main risk is paying for non-targeted or boosted views that will not yield real clicks and conversions.
Similar channels in Computer science
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
All channels in Computer science
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.