Learn to code and become a Web Developer with HTML, CSS, JavaScript, React, Node.js 💳 Paid ads: https://telega.io/c/Webdev_Trainings
checked 2026-09-06
- Subscribers
- 133,851
- Median views
- 11,185
- ERR
- 8.4%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
With a subscriber base exceeding 130,000 and a median reach of 11,000 views, posts receive less than 0.1% reactions, and comments are completely closed. The channel is primarily used as an archive or showcase of educational materials where the audience barely interacts with posts, or views are artificially inflated. For an advertiser, this poses a significant risk of low response and minimal click-throughs, even with stable formal view metrics.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 15 checked Computer science channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 45,235 to 294,734 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-06
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @webdev_trainings assessment dated 2026-09-06 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 133,851 subscribers, median post views were 11,185, ERR was 8.4%, and the cleanliness index was 55/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
The audience barely reacts to posts.
About 5,593–11,185 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts among the latest 40.
What grade C means
Some metrics are worrying: views may be partly inflated or the audience passive. Be careful with ads.
What to pay attention to
Views without engagement (reactions ≈ 0.090% of views)
There are views, but almost no reactions. This is typical of inflated views: bots "view", but do not react.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 5 to Sep 4. The dashed line is the median (11,185).
- post views
- median 11,185
Maximum: 17,233 views. Data as of Sep 6.
What could not be calculated
View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-09-06 — 14 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @webdev_trainings and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @webdev_trainingsQuestions about @webdev_trainings
What is the risk level of inflated metrics in this channel?
The channel has a moderate risk score of 45 out of 100. Suspicions stem from the combination of stable views with an abnormally low number of reactions and disabled comments.
Why is placing ads assessed as questionable?
The reason for this verdict is an extremely passive audience: only 0.09% of readers leave reactions based on the view count. In the absence of active engagement, advertising may fail to yield the expected clicks and conversions.
What reach will an ad post get?
The median post reach is about 11.2 thousand views (ERR 8.36%) with a posting frequency of 1.3 posts per day. However, due to audience disengagement, expecting high returns from these numbers is risky.
Similar channels in Computer science
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
All channels in Computer science
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.