TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @webdev_trainings

Fake engagement check for @webdev_trainings

Web Development — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-06.

Learn to code and become a Web Developer with HTML, CSS, JavaScript, React, Node.js 💳 Paid ads: https://telega.io/c/Webdev_Trainings

Grade C some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-06
Subscribers
133,851
Median views
11,185
ERR
8.4%
Posts sampled
40

Assessment summary

With a subscriber base exceeding 130,000 and a median reach of 11,000 views, posts receive less than 0.1% reactions, and comments are completely closed. The channel is primarily used as an archive or showcase of educational materials where the audience barely interacts with posts, or views are artificially inflated. For an advertiser, this poses a significant risk of low response and minimal click-throughs, even with stable formal view metrics.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 15 checked Computer science channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 45,235 to 294,734 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 9 of 15
8.4% for @webdev_trainings similar channels median: 6.1%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 13 of 13
0.09 for @webdev_trainings similar channels median: 0.24

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-06
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @webdev_trainings assessment dated 2026-09-06 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 133,851 subscribers, median post views were 11,185, ERR was 8.4%, and the cleanliness index was 55/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The audience barely reacts to posts.

About 5,593–11,185 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

What grade C means

Some metrics are worrying: views may be partly inflated or the audience passive. Be careful with ads.

What to pay attention to

Views without engagement (reactions ≈ 0.090% of views)

There are views, but almost no reactions. This is typical of inflated views: bots "view", but do not react.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 5 to Sep 4. The dashed line is the median (11,185).

08.6K17KAug 5: 12,390 viewsAug 5: 14,387 viewsAug 5: 13,439 viewsAug 5: 11,206 viewsAug 5: 11,057 viewsAug 5: 11,190 viewsAug 7: 13,614 viewsAug 7: 14,724 viewsAug 10: 12,422 viewsAug 10: 17,233 viewsAug 10: 15,544 viewsAug 10: 14,123 viewsAug 10: 12,295 viewsAug 10: 13,226 viewsAug 10: 10,814 viewsAug 12: 12,192 viewsAug 14: 11,903 viewsAug 14: 12,168 viewsAug 17: 11,478 viewsAug 17: 11,180 viewsAug 19: 10,984 viewsAug 21: 10,150 viewsAug 23: 8,890 viewsAug 26: 7,464 viewsAug 26: 7,349 viewsAug 26: 7,410 viewsAug 26: 8,710 viewsAug 26: 7,598 viewsAug 26: 7,011 viewsAug 26: 7,017 viewsAug 26: 11,265 viewsAug 26: 10,962 viewsAug 26: 10,682 viewsAug 26: 10,341 viewsAug 26: 9,585 viewsAug 26: 11,591 viewsAug 26: 11,548 viewsAug 28: 10,333 viewsAug 31: 8,114 viewsSep 4: 3,524 views Aug 5Sep 4

Maximum: 17,233 views. Data as of Sep 6.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Check today: @webdev_trainings

Data from 2026-09-06 — 14 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @webdev_trainings and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @webdev_trainings

Questions about @webdev_trainings

What is the risk level of inflated metrics in this channel?

The channel has a moderate risk score of 45 out of 100. Suspicions stem from the combination of stable views with an abnormally low number of reactions and disabled comments.

Why is placing ads assessed as questionable?

The reason for this verdict is an extremely passive audience: only 0.09% of readers leave reactions based on the view count. In the absence of active engagement, advertising may fail to yield the expected clicks and conversions.

What reach will an ad post get?

The median post reach is about 11.2 thousand views (ERR 8.36%) with a posting frequency of 1.3 posts per day. However, due to audience disengagement, expecting high returns from these numbers is risky.

Similar channels in Computer science

All channels in Computer science

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @webdev_trainings