TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @zrabota

@zrabota: statistics and cleanliness index

АйТи Вакансии. ИИ Работа. Фриланс. Удаленка

Свежие АйТи/Диджитал вакансии каждый день по работе из любой точки мира удалённо Разместить вакансию: @hichnii

Share this report
Telegram

Grade C some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-03
Subscribers
22,163
Median views
159
ERR
0.7%
Posts sampled
40

Data from 2026-09-03 — 35 days old.

Assessment summary

Over the last two and a half months, the channel has lost over 3,100 subscribers, while median views have plummeted more than threefold — from 499 to 159. Combined with disabled comments and the deletion of about 35% of publications, this indicates a deeply burned-out audience base where posts are opened by less than 1% of followers.

For an advertiser, purchasing an integration under these conditions means overpaying for an inactive storefront of 22,000 nominal subscribers.

What to pay attention to

Extremely low reach: ERR ≈ 0.7% with 22,163 subscribers

Median views are a fraction of a percent of the subscriber count: almost none of the audience sees a post. The subscribers are there, but the views are not.

What grade C means

Some metrics fall outside usual values — for example reach, view spread or reactions. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 12 Job Listings catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 7,848 to 60,320 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 12 of 12
@zrabota 0.7%
similar channels median 9.9%

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 25 to Sep 3. The dashed line is the median (159).

0111223Aug 25: 195 viewsAug 25: 223 viewsAug 25: 200 viewsAug 26: 205 viewsAug 26: 221 viewsAug 26: 208 viewsAug 26: 171 viewsAug 27: 178 viewsAug 27: 166 viewsAug 27: 205 viewsAug 27: 193 viewsAug 28: 172 viewsAug 28: 154 viewsAug 28: 141 viewsAug 28: 153 viewsAug 29: 150 viewsAug 29: 137 viewsAug 29: 157 viewsAug 29: 150 viewsAug 30: 143 viewsAug 30: 186 viewsAug 30: 193 viewsAug 30: 196 viewsAug 31: 172 viewsAug 31: 165 viewsAug 31: 176 viewsAug 31: 166 viewsSep 1: 155 viewsSep 1: 161 viewsSep 1: 143 viewsSep 1: 131 viewsSep 2: 115 viewsSep 2: 137 viewsSep 2: 143 viewsSep 2: 129 viewsSep 2: 85 viewsSep 2: 82 viewsSep 3: 59 viewsSep 3: 74 viewsSep 3: 52 views Aug 25Sep 3
  • post views
  • 6 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 159

Maximum: 223 views. Data as of Sep 3.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Extremely low reach: ERR ≈ 0.7% with 22,163 subscribers

Median views are a fraction of a percent of the subscriber count: almost none of the audience sees a post. The subscribers are there, but the views are not.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 20: index 55, grade CJun 20Sep 3: index 55, grade CSep 3

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 85–134 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 0. 3 more are too fresh.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @zrabota

What is the channel's risk level and why?

The channel received a risk score of 45 out of 100 (medium risk). The main reasons are critically low reach (ERR around 0.7%), disabled comments, and an ongoing audience outflow.

Why is advertising here considered questionable?

With a subscriber base of over 22,000, a post averages only 159 views. A negligible share of the audience sees the publication, making an advertising ROI highly unlikely.

Are there any signs of fraud in the feed?

No signs of scam were found in the publications: the feed features standard job openings and partner materials. The channel's main issue is solely tied to audience inactivity and decay.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-03
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @zrabota assessment dated 2026-09-03 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 22,163 subscribers, median post views were 159, ERR was 0.7%, and the cleanliness index was 55/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.