Fake engagement check for @yuriifrost
Frost — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-26.
Включена Роскомнадзором в перечень персональных страниц. А+https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=67492069c577eb7c52327991®istryType=bloggersPermission
Assessment summary
The channel is a personal travel and hiking blog with clean organic activity: a consistent view distribution (CV 0.34) and open comments confirm genuine audience engagement. With a moderate posting pace of about 4 posts per day and zero feed clutter from third-party ads, a native placement will receive full attention, targeting a baseline reach of 7.6 thousand views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-08-26
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @yuriifrost assessment dated 2026-08-26 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 61,865 subscribers, median post views were 7,625, ERR was 12.3%, and the cleanliness index was 99/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: reasonable.
Estimated 48-hour reach: 5,026–6,096 views.
Reach of advertising posts
No advertising posts were found among the latest 40 posts, so there is nothing to compare.
What grade A+ means
The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 15 to Aug 25. The dashed line is the median (7,625).
- post views
- median 7,625
The sample maximum is 13,674 views. Snapshot dated Aug 26; the axis is not clipped, so spikes remain visible.
What could not be calculated
View maturation was not assessed: at the time of the check, the channel had no posts newer than one day to compare with older posts.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once, so there is nothing to compare yet. The chart will appear after another check.
This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-26. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.
Buy advertising
The channel does not appear to be in the high-risk zone. These marketplaces provide channel catalogs, pricing, and payment on their own platforms.
TG Inspector does not sell placements or participate in the transaction. A specific channel may be absent from a marketplace.
Monitor this channel
Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.
Monitor @yuriifrostQuestions about @yuriifrost
Is it safe to advertise on this channel?
Yes, the risk score is 1/100 with high analysis confidence. The channel has open comments, shows no signs of artificial inflation or deleted posts, and ad placement is considered justified.
What actual reach will an ad post get?
The median post reach is around 7,625 views (ERR ≈ 12.33%). This serves as a steady baseline benchmark for calculating the cost per contact.
Will the post get lost among other content?
The posting frequency is moderate at about 4 posts per day, and there is zero third-party advertising in the analyzed sample (0%). This ensures good visibility for new posts in the feed.
Other checked channels
This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.