TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @ytbets

@ytbets: statistics and cleanliness index

YT BETS

Бот для ставок-@ytgamebot

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-08-25
Subscribers
15
Median views
10
ERR
66.7%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Video Games

Data from 2026-08-25 — 44 days old.

Assessment summary

A channel with 15 subscribers and a median of 10 views serves as a technical feed exporting game bot results, where 90% of publications are reposts and system logs.

With comments disabled and no established community, placing third-party advertising has no practical value, as the resource lacks its own engaged audience.

What to pay attention to

Views are not maturing (old ≈ fresh, ×1.17)

Older posts usually collect 1.5–3 times more views than day-old ones, because people keep reading them. Here older posts collected about as many as fresh ones. Caveat: there are only 1 day-old posts in the sample — too few to judge the channel, so this observation counts as weak.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 72 Video Games catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 1 to 2,618,495 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 55 of 72
@ytbets 66.7%
similar channels median 28.7%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 69 of 70
@ytbets 19.93
similar channels median 1.87

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 6 to Aug 24. The dashed line is the median (10).

01428Aug 6: 10 viewsAug 6: 8 viewsAug 6: 8 viewsAug 6: 7 viewsAug 7: 7 viewsAug 7: 9 viewsAug 7: 8 viewsAug 7: 10 viewsAug 7: 10 viewsAug 7: 8 viewsAug 7: 11 viewsAug 7: 8 viewsAug 7: 11 viewsAug 7: 12 viewsAug 7: 14 viewsAug 7: 10 viewsAug 10: 12 viewsAug 10: 11 viewsAug 10: 11 viewsAug 10: 8 viewsAug 10: 8 viewsAug 10: 8 viewsAug 10: 7 viewsAug 10: 11 viewsAug 10: 8 viewsAug 10: 8 viewsAug 10: 7 viewsAug 10: 12 viewsAug 10: 13 viewsAug 10: 13 viewsAug 10: 12 viewsAug 10: 11 viewsAug 10: 13 viewsAug 10: 27 viewsAug 10: 24 viewsAug 10: 16 viewsAug 10: 28 viewsAug 10: 28 viewsAug 18: 17 viewsAug 24: 9 views Aug 6Aug 24
  • post views
  • 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 10

Maximum: 28 views. Data as of Aug 25.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Views are not maturing (old ≈ fresh, ×1.17)

Older posts usually collect 1.5–3 times more views than day-old ones, because people keep reading them. Here older posts collected about as many as fresh ones. Caveat: there are only 1 day-old posts in the sample — too few to judge the channel, so this observation counts as weak.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jul 25: index 55, grade CJul 25Aug 25: index 91, grade A+Aug 25

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Mostly reposts and weak reach — little audience of its own.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @ytbets

What fake engagement risk level has been determined for the channel?

The risk score is 9 out of 100 (green zone), but due to a base of only 15 subscribers, confidence in the assessment is low.

What audience and reach do the publications generate?

The median reach is around 10 views per post, and comments in the channel are disabled.

Why is buying ads on this channel considered questionable?

The feed consists primarily of reposts and automated bot reports, so the channel does not have an active audience sufficient for effective advertising.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-08-25
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @ytbets assessment dated 2026-08-25 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 15 subscribers, median post views were 10, ERR was 66.7%, and the cleanliness index was 91/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.