TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @YotolabQA

@YotolabQA: statistics and cleanliness index

QA Вакансии & Работа для тестировщиков

@YotolabSup - для рекламы и публикации вакансии Канал вакансий для QA специалистов. Вакансии со всего интернета! Ежедневная публикация. @yotolabchatqa - чат QA специалистов

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
8,352
Median views
1,236
ERR
14.8%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Job Listings

Data from 2026-09-08 — 30 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel demonstrates stable organic metrics: an audience growth of 770 subscribers over almost three months is accompanied by a commensurate increase in views, and promotional posts are practically not inferior to regular ones in reach (a difference of only 2%). With a moderate posting pace of about 3 posts per day, an advertising message does not drown immediately in the feed and gathers the ~1,300 views typical for the channel.

Closed comments here do not carry a risk of artificial inflation, being a standard practice for job boards to protect against spam.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 14 Job Listings catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 4,802 to 22,304 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 8 of 14
@YotolabQA 14.8%
similar channels median 11.8%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 8 of 11
@YotolabQA 0.28
similar channels median 1.03

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 25 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (1,236).

08081.6KAug 25: 1,362 viewsAug 25: 1,238 viewsAug 25: 1,221 viewsAug 25: 1,291 viewsAug 26: 1,375 viewsAug 26: 1,373 viewsAug 26: 1,283 viewsAug 27: 1,184 viewsAug 27: 1,297 viewsAug 27: 1,342 viewsAug 27: 1,459 viewsAug 28: 1,449 viewsAug 28: 1,328 viewsAug 28: 1,372 viewsAug 28: 1,486 viewsAug 29: 1,540 viewsAug 29: 1,617 viewsAug 30: 1,581 viewsAug 31: 1,452 viewsAug 31: 1,549 viewsSep 1: 1,546 viewsSep 2: 1,431 viewsSep 3: 1,226 viewsSep 3: 1,106 viewsSep 3: 1,025 viewsSep 3: 1,187 viewsSep 3: 1,234 viewsSep 4: 1,148 viewsSep 4: 989 viewsSep 4: 892 viewsSep 4: 969 viewsSep 5: 1,113 viewsSep 7: 907 viewsSep 7: 812 viewsSep 7: 771 viewsSep 8: 700 viewsSep 8: 734 viewsSep 8: 679 viewsSep 8: 529 viewsSep 8: 416 views Aug 25Sep 8
  • post views
  • 7 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 1,236

Maximum: 1,617 views. Data as of Sep 8.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 14: index 100, grade A+Jun 14Sep 8: index 100, grade A+Sep 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 627–763 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 1,297 views versus 1,328 for regular posts — 2% lower.

Based on 3 advertising and 29 regular posts older than two days.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @YotolabQA

Are there any signs of audience or view inflation on the channel?

No, the risk score is 0 out of 100. The view variance (CV 0.26) is within normal limits for genuine channels, and audience and view growth over recent months appears natural.

What real reach does an advertising post achieve?

The median ad reach is about 1,297 views (ERR around 14.8%), which is virtually identical to the reach of regular vacancy posts.

Is advertising on this channel justified?

Yes, placement is considered justified due to a stable target audience, a low share of third-party ads (8%), and no signs of artificially inflated metrics.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @YotolabQA assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 8,352 subscribers, median post views were 1,236, ERR was 14.8%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.