TG Inspector TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Channel unavailable The channel has almost no posts left, so it cannot be scored again. The figures and score below are as of the last check, 2026-09-08.
Avatar of @XOfficiaI

@XOfficiaI: statistics and cleanliness index

ЖOfficial

Historic.

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
13
Median views
618
ERR
4753.8%
Posts sampled
38
Niche Blogs

Data from 2026-09-08 — 59 days old.

Assessment summary

An abnormal excess of views over the subscriber base (618 views with 13 readers) combined with the deletion of 95% of publications indicates that the channel was completely cleared or receives views through external forwards.

With a posting frequency of only 0.1 posts per day, the feed is practically frozen, so advertising here will not provide predictable reach.

What to pay attention to

Some messages were deleted: ≈95% of message numbers are missing

The numbering of the channel's recent messages has many gaps — some of them were deleted. Message numbers are counted, not posts: every photo in an album has its own number. Deleted posts are not visible, so the remaining ones give only a partial picture of the channel.

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 5 Blogs catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 14 to 38 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 5 of 5
@XOfficiaI 4753.8%
similar channels median 415.8%

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Scroll horizontally to see the full charts.

Views by post

The latest 38 posts with views, from Oct 6 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (618).

0438877Oct 6: 548 viewsOct 14: 616 viewsOct 16: 602 viewsOct 16: 619 viewsOct 16: 630 viewsOct 16: 629 viewsOct 16: 657 viewsOct 16: 673 viewsOct 16: 684 viewsOct 16: 687 viewsOct 16: 700 viewsOct 16: 710 viewsOct 16: 712 viewsOct 16: 756 viewsOct 16: 758 viewsOct 16: 775 viewsOct 16: 788 viewsOct 16: 796 viewsOct 23: 793 viewsOct 26: 877 viewsNov 24: 841 viewsMar 22: 619 viewsApr 7: 617 viewsApr 15: 571 viewsApr 22: 522 viewsApr 27: 500 viewsApr 28: 521 viewsJul 11: 511 viewsJul 16: 540 viewsJul 31: 540 viewsAug 1: 499 viewsSep 10: 411 viewsOct 20: 372 viewsOct 27: 399 viewsOct 29: 420 viewsNov 5: 395 viewsAug 3: 329 viewsSep 8: 90 views Oct 6Sep 8
  • post views
  • 1 post newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 618

Maximum: 877 views. Data as of Sep 8.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel's data has been collected once — the chart will appear after the next update.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Posts come out rarely, so an ad will struggle to get views.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 38.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @XOfficiaI

What is the risk level of this channel?

The channel has a medium risk (50/100) with low analysis confidence due to the small sample of subscribers. Placement is marked as controversial due to extremely rare content publication.

Where does the reach of over 4000% come from?

The median view count is 618 with only 13 subscribers. Such numbers occur either from viral forwards of posts to external chats or from artificial inflation of metrics.

Is buying ads on the channel justified?

Ad placement here is considered controversial due to activity: posts appear with a frequency of about 0.1 per day. With such rare posting, it is impossible to guarantee stable audience attention.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 38 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @XOfficiaI assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 38 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 13 subscribers, median post views were 618, ERR was 4753.8%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/obsessed_with_ai.