TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @XOfficiaI

Fake engagement check for @XOfficiaI

ЖOfficial — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-08.

Historic.

Grade D some signals require caution cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-08
Subscribers
13
Median views
618
ERR
4753.8%
Posts sampled
38
Niche Blogs

Assessment summary

An abnormal excess of views over the subscriber base (618 views with 13 readers) combined with the deletion of 95% of publications indicates that the channel was completely cleared or receives views through external forwards. With a posting frequency of only 0.1 posts per day, the feed is practically frozen, so advertising here will not provide predictable reach.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 6 checked Blogs channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 14 to 39 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 6 of 6
4753.8% for @XOfficiaI similar channels median: 532%

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 38 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @XOfficiaI assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 38 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 13 subscribers, median post views were 618, ERR was 4753.8%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Posts come out rarely, so an ad will struggle to get views.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 38.

What grade D means

Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.

What to pay attention to

It looks like some posts were deleted (≈95% gaps in numbering)

There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide delivered ads and conceal their actual reach. By itself, this sign is indirect (posts are also deleted during edits).

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 38 posts with views, from Oct 6 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (618).

0438877Oct 6: 548 viewsOct 14: 616 viewsOct 16: 602 viewsOct 16: 619 viewsOct 16: 630 viewsOct 16: 629 viewsOct 16: 657 viewsOct 16: 673 viewsOct 16: 684 viewsOct 16: 687 viewsOct 16: 700 viewsOct 16: 710 viewsOct 16: 712 viewsOct 16: 756 viewsOct 16: 758 viewsOct 16: 775 viewsOct 16: 788 viewsOct 16: 796 viewsOct 23: 793 viewsOct 26: 877 viewsNov 24: 841 viewsMar 22: 619 viewsApr 7: 617 viewsApr 15: 571 viewsApr 22: 522 viewsApr 27: 500 viewsApr 28: 521 viewsJul 11: 511 viewsJul 16: 540 viewsJul 31: 540 viewsAug 1: 499 viewsSep 10: 411 viewsOct 20: 372 viewsOct 27: 399 viewsOct 29: 420 viewsNov 5: 395 viewsAug 3: 329 viewsSep 8: 90 views Oct 6Sep 8

Maximum: 877 views. Data as of Sep 8.

No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Check today: @XOfficiaI

Data from 2026-09-08 — 12 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @XOfficiaI and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @XOfficiaI

Questions about @XOfficiaI

What is the risk level of this channel?

The channel has a medium risk (50/100) with low analysis confidence due to the small sample of subscribers. Placement is marked as controversial due to extremely rare content publication.

Where does the reach of over 4000% come from?

The median view count is 618 with only 13 subscribers. Such numbers occur either from viral forwards of posts to external chats or from artificial inflation of metrics.

Is buying ads on the channel justified?

Ad placement here is considered controversial due to activity: posts appear with a frequency of about 0.1 per day. With such rare posting, it is impossible to guarantee stable audience attention.

Similar channels in Blogs

All channels in Blogs

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.

Check @XOfficiaI