TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @vibeeeeeeeee52

Fake engagement check for @vibeeeeeeeee52

Работа в Москве для мигрантов — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-03.

Работа для мигрантов! По поводу размещения Рекламный менеджер: @czartg

50/100
cleanliness index
Grade D
some signals require caution
Subscribers
51517
Median views
5208
ERR
10.1%
Posts sampled
23
Niche
Promotions and deals

Evidence snapshot

The @vibeeeeeeeee52 assessment dated 2026-08-03 uses 23 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 51,517 subscribers, median post views were 5,208, ERR was 10.1%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The audience appears passive because posts receive very few reactions.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 4,208–6,040 views.

What grade D means

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

Run a fresh check for @vibeeeeeeeee52

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-03. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @vibeeeeeeeee52

Questions about @vibeeeeeeeee52

What does grade D mean for @vibeeeeeeeee52?

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

What is the ERR of @vibeeeeeeeee52?

ERR is 10.1%. Median post views equal 10.1% of the channel's 51,517 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 50/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @vibeeeeeeeee52