TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @trade_funding

Fake engagement check for @trade_funding

LUDOMANIA CRYPTO — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-08.

Да-да нет-нет Если повторяете за мной - на свой страх и риск! Главный: @bloody_santa

50/100
cleanliness index
Grade D
some signals require caution
Subscribers
3834
Median views
1271
ERR
33.2%
Posts sampled
15
Niche
Cryptocurrency

Evidence snapshot

The @trade_funding assessment dated 2026-08-08 uses 15 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 3,834 subscribers, median post views were 1,271, ERR was 33.2%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The channel carries a heavy advertising load, so another promotion may be lost in the feed.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 1,004–1,331 views.

What grade D means

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

Run a fresh check for @trade_funding

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-08. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @trade_funding

Questions about @trade_funding

What does grade D mean for @trade_funding?

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

What is the ERR of @trade_funding?

ERR is 33.2%. Median post views equal 33.2% of the channel's 3,834 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 50/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @trade_funding