TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @tooseriousnotes

@tooseriousnotes: statistics and cleanliness index

Серьезный подход

Серьезный подход к несерьезным проблемам от выпускниц журфака и экс работников Condé Nast @emialoyan и @katelaskova По коммерческим запросам — @emialoyan Канал зарегистрирован в РКН: https://clck.ru/3PEfBr #JR5AT

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-01
Subscribers
34,273
Median views
2,750
ERR
8%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Celebrities & lifestyle

Data from 2026-09-01 — 37 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel demonstrates organic engagement metrics without signs of manipulation: view dispersion is within the normal range (CV 0.33), and open comments reflect an active audience. However, advertising here is debatable due to the high posting frequency (10.5 posts per day), which puts an ad post at risk of quickly getting lost in the feed.

Additionally, it is worth considering the trend over the last 42 days, during which median views decreased from 3143 to 2750.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 11 Celebrities & lifestyle catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 14,661 to 62,387 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 9 of 11
@tooseriousnotes 8%
similar channels median 39.7%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 6 of 10
@tooseriousnotes 2.02
similar channels median 1.54

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Aug 28 to Sep 1. The dashed line is the median (2,750).

01.5K3KAug 28: 3,015 viewsAug 29: 2,835 viewsAug 29: 2,876 viewsAug 29: 2,882 viewsAug 29: 2,874 viewsAug 29: 2,858 viewsAug 29: 2,858 viewsAug 29: 2,857 viewsAug 29: 2,756 viewsAug 30: 3,002 viewsAug 30: 3,018 viewsAug 30: 3,012 viewsAug 30: 3,017 viewsAug 30: 3,014 viewsAug 30: 2,752 viewsAug 30: 2,786 viewsAug 30: 2,786 viewsAug 30: 2,784 viewsAug 30: 2,748 viewsAug 30: 2,778 viewsAug 30: 2,779 viewsAug 30: 2,745 viewsAug 31: 2,127 viewsAug 31: 2,185 viewsAug 31: 2,007 viewsAug 31: 2,005 viewsAug 31: 2,007 viewsAug 31: 1,996 viewsAug 31: 1,996 viewsAug 31: 1,997 viewsAug 31: 1,999 viewsAug 31: 1,959 viewsSep 1: 937 viewsSep 1: 937 viewsSep 1: 938 viewsSep 1: 936 viewsSep 1: 937 viewsSep 1: 936 viewsSep 1: 936 viewsSep 1: 936 views Aug 28Sep 1
  • post views
  • 16 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 2,750

Maximum: 3,018 views. Data as of Sep 1.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jul 20: index 97, grade A+Jul 20Sep 1: index 99, grade A+Sep 1

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

So many posts that an ad quickly slides down the feed.

About 1,471–2,747 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @tooseriousnotes

Are there any signs of audience manipulation on the channel?

No, the risk score is 1/100 with high analysis confidence. Engagement and view metrics correspond to natural subscriber behavior.

Why is the feasibility of advertising on the channel marked as debatable?

The reason is the high posting density — about 10-11 posts daily. In such a high-volume content format, an ad post quickly moves down the feed.

What post reach should be expected?

The current median is around 2750 views per post (ERR around 8%). Over the past month, a slight decrease in baseline reach from 3143 views was recorded.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-01
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @tooseriousnotes assessment dated 2026-09-01 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 34,273 subscribers, median post views were 2,750, ERR was 8.0%, and the cleanliness index was 99/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.