TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @tgfree_top

@tgfree_top: statistics and cleanliness index

Почти даром

⏫Подпишись, пока всю халяву не прикрыли! 🎈Канал с лучшими скидками, акциями и промокодами! 🎈Купить рекламу: @Diggsale @Petrovadmin1 Связь @Petrovadmin1

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
4,393
Median views
709
ERR
16.1%
Posts sampled
40

Data from 2026-09-08 — 30 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel has a minimal risk of artificial inflation (score 5); however, placing ads is considered debatable due to a 52% ad share, where an announcement will simply get lost among endless discount coupons. The situation is aggravated by the fact that the channel has been inactive for over 40 days, and the audience has shrunk by almost a thousand people over the last three months.

Buying placements in an abandoned CPA feed is impractical until the admin resumes regular posting and audience retention.

What to pay attention to

High share of ad posts (≈ 52%)

More than half of the posts contain links to other channels or an erid label. Weak sign: the channel might be tailored for ad reselling.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Channel content

📣 Heavy advertising load

The feed consists entirely of affiliate promo codes, marketplace referral links, and ads for third-party projects.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 9 Offers & Promotions catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 1,717 to 10,351 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 8 of 9
@tgfree_top 16.1%
similar channels median 35.7%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 8 of 8
@tgfree_top 1.67
similar channels median 0.53

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Mar 17 to Jul 27. The dashed line is the median (709).

06871.4KMar 17: 851 viewsMar 20: 656 viewsMar 20: 794 viewsMar 20: 713 viewsMar 20: 658 viewsMar 20: 610 viewsMar 20: 594 viewsMar 20: 659 viewsMar 20: 635 viewsMar 21: 722 viewsMar 21: 704 viewsMar 21: 718 viewsMar 22: 706 viewsMar 22: 692 viewsMar 22: 719 viewsMar 23: 736 viewsMar 24: 762 viewsMar 24: 738 viewsMar 24: 766 viewsMar 24: 558 viewsMar 24: 531 viewsMar 24: 637 viewsMar 24: 726 viewsMar 24: 675 viewsMar 25: 626 viewsMar 25: 666 viewsMar 25: 631 viewsMar 25: 656 viewsMar 27: 794 viewsMar 27: 718 viewsMar 27: 676 viewsMar 27: 663 viewsMar 27: 764 viewsMar 27: 685 viewsMar 27: 831 viewsMar 27: 1,072 viewsApr 8: 1,374 viewsApr 20: 977 viewsJun 28: 1,206 viewsJul 27: 946 views Mar 17Jul 27
  • post views
  • median 709

Maximum: 1,374 views. Data as of Sep 8.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 11: index 100, grade A+Jun 11Sep 8: index 95, grade A+Sep 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Too many ads — yours will get lost.

No new posts for over two weeks, so ad reach can't be forecast right now.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 713 views versus 704 for regular posts — 1% higher.

Based on 21 advertising and 19 regular posts older than two days.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @tgfree_top

Are the channel's subscribers and views artificially inflated?

There are no technical signs of inflation, with a risk score of a minimal 5 out of 100. The spread of views is natural, although the overall confidence of the analysis remains low due to the modest size of the channel.

What reach does a publication get?

The median reach is about 709 views per post with an engagement rate of around 16%. Ad publications gather as many views as regular posts.

Is it worth buying ads on this channel?

Placement is considered debatable: over half of the publications are direct ads, which dilutes the audience's attention. Additionally, the channel has not been updated for over a month and is losing subscribers.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @tgfree_top assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 4,393 subscribers, median post views were 709, ERR was 16.1%, and the cleanliness index was 95/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.