Fake engagement check for @TaRnUm_Ml

TaRnUm — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-09-20.

Начал вести стримы: 30.03.2026 Мой Telegram: @TaRnUm_2 Twitch: https://twitch.tv/tarnum_mlbb

95 /100

Grade A+ low manipulation risk cleanliness index
checked 2026-09-20

Subscribers: 253
Median views: 129
ERR: 51.0%
Posts sampled: 40

Niche Video Games

Post language Russian

Channel age 6 months

Assessment summary

The channel is a blog of a novice Mobile Legends streamer with a small but engaged base of 253 subscribers. Communication among a tight-knit circle of 7 commenters and a reach of around 130 views are typical of an organic Twitch viewer core rather than artificial boosting. Placing ads here is safe; however, an advertiser should take the intimate scale of the audience into account when planning the budget.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 9 checked Video Games channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 93 to 738 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 6 of 9

51% for @TaRnUm_Ml similar channels median: 57.3%

Reactions per 100 views higher than 8 of 9

7.04 for @TaRnUm_Ml similar channels median: 3.58

This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.

How the assessment was produced

Data source: Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot: 2026-09-20
Sample: The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method: TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result: The @TaRnUm_Ml assessment dated 2026-09-20 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 253 subscribers, median post views were 129, ERR was 51.0%, and the cleanliness index was 95/100.
Limitations: This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 125 views versus 133 for regular posts — 6% lower.

Based on 3 advertising and 32 regular posts older than two days.

Without an ad label: 1 post.

What grade A+ means

Almost no signs of manipulation: reactions look real and reach matches the subscriber count. The safest place for ads.

What to pay attention to

Comments are posted by a narrow circle of accounts (7 out of 21)

The share of unique authors among comments is low—the discussion is driven by a small group of accounts. This could be an active core, but it is worth checking whether it is artificial engagement.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 8 to Sep 20. The dashed line is the median (129).

post views
2 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
median 129

Maximum: 163 views. Data as of Sep 20.

No deviations found in views. Manipulation doesn't always show up in views, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.

Run a fresh check for @TaRnUm_Ml

Data from 2026-09-20 — fresh.

Buy advertising

No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Monitor this channel

The bot will recheck @TaRnUm_Ml and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.

Monitor @TaRnUm_Ml

Questions about @TaRnUm_Ml

Are there signs of audience manipulation on the channel?

No, the risk score is 5 out of 100, and the audience behavior is characteristic of an organic gaming community. The low audit confidence is solely due to the small size of the subscriber base.

How many views does an ad get?

The median reach of sponsored posts is 125 views compared to 133 for regular posts. Publications are seen by about half of the channel's subscribers.

Is buying ads on this channel justified?

The placement is considered justified; the feed is clean and regularly updated. The channel is suitable for inexpensive targeted integrations in gaming-related niches.