TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @rudra_cricket_analyst

@rudra_cricket_analyst: statistics and cleanliness index

RUDRA - Cricket Analyst

❤️🙏🌹 जय श्री श्याम 🌹🙏❤️ @RUDRA_SESSION

Share this report
Telegram

Grade D some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-10
Subscribers
227,521
Median views
5,979
ERR
2.6%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Bets & Gambling
Post language Hindi
Channel age 8 years

Data from 2026-10-10 — fresh.

Assessment summary

The channel RUDRA - Cricket Analyst is a narrow-specialization feed with predictions for Indian cricket and betting.

The median number of views is about 6000 with 227 thousand subscribers, which gives a reach of ERR 2.6% — only one in forty subscribers sees a post. Views are abnormally even (spread 0.12), and 61% of the last 102 messages have been deleted. In addition, the channel is abandoned: the last post was published 131 days ago, which completely rules out current promotion.

About the channel

The channel RUDRA - Cricket Analyst is dedicated to betting on Indian cricket. The feed consists of posts in Hindi and English using template texts and images. The channel publishes announcements of IPL matches and international series, as well as betting offers on toss results and totals. The audience is bookmaker bettors and cricket fans.

The channel has been running for more than 8 years, but activity has decreased in recent months: the last post was published 131 days ago. During active periods, with a posting frequency of 8.9 posts per day, the feed updates quickly. The post format is short text notes and infographics with match schedules.

What is published:

  • Match predictions: short posts with predictions of toss results and totals.
  • Game announcements: schedules of IPL matches and international series with times and venues.
  • Calls to activity: messages for subscribers to be ready for the final games.

Posts are published mainly during daytime and morning hours (UTC). About 78% of posts are text only. The channel has been inactive for more than 4 months, and some messages were deleted.

By subscribers, it ranks #9 of 34 channels in the Bets & Gambling niche of the catalog.

What to pay attention to

Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.6%

Engagement by views is below the norm for a channel of this size. It may be explained by the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

What grade D means

The index is clearly lowered: one or more metrics fall outside usual values. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Channel content

🚩 Possible scam or deception signals

The posts contain clear signs of illegal sports betting and scam: calls to gambling (“GAMILY”), offers of “fixed” bets (“FIXED TOSS”), as well as links to external prediction services with promises of winnings.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 9 Bets & Gambling catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 99,878 to 647,230 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 8 of 9
@rudra_cricket_analyst 2.6%
similar channels median 18.9%

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from May 27 to Jun 1. The dashed line is the median (5,979).

04K7.9KMay 27: 6,752 viewsMay 27: 6,661 viewsMay 28: 6,086 viewsMay 28: 6,048 viewsMay 28: 6,181 viewsMay 29: 5,347 viewsMay 29: 5,243 viewsMay 29: 5,721 viewsMay 29: 5,221 viewsMay 29: 5,660 viewsMay 29: 6,928 viewsMay 29: 6,476 viewsMay 29: 6,460 viewsMay 29: 6,437 viewsMay 29: 6,441 viewsMay 29: 5,911 viewsMay 29: 5,725 viewsMay 29: 5,576 viewsMay 30: 5,077 viewsMay 30: 4,735 viewsMay 30: 4,998 viewsMay 30: 5,164 viewsMay 30: 4,952 viewsMay 30: 5,317 viewsMay 30: 6,462 viewsMay 30: 6,189 viewsMay 30: 5,894 viewsMay 30: 5,800 viewsMay 30: 5,787 viewsMay 30: 5,761 viewsMay 31: 5,544 viewsMay 31: 6,422 viewsMay 31: 6,570 viewsMay 31: 7,134 viewsMay 31: 7,043 viewsMay 31: 7,062 viewsMay 31: 7,941 viewsMay 31: 6,424 viewsMay 31: 6,233 viewsJun 1: 5,584 views May 27Jun 1
  • post views
  • median 5,979

Maximum: 7,941 views. Data as of Oct 10.

What scoring found in the view pattern

Low reach: ERR ≈ 2.6%

Engagement by views is below the norm for a channel of this size. It may be explained by the niche and a passive audience, but it is worth checking.

Views are more even than usual (CV ≈ 0.12)

The spread of views between posts is lower than usual for channels (0.15–0.6): posts gather almost the same number of views.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel's data has been collected once — the chart will appear after the next update.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

Not enough posts for a forecast.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @rudra_cricket_analyst

What does the purity index 50/100 (grade D) mean for the channel @rudra_cricket_analyst?

The purity index 50/100 means the level “deviations present”. This indicates that the channel has recorded metrics that significantly differ from normal indicators: most messages were deleted, post views are abnormally even, and reach (ERR) is only 2.6%.

How effective is ad placement in the channel @rudra_cricket_analyst?

Ad placement here is questionable. Only 2.6% of the total number of subscribers see the posts (median views about 6000), which is a very low indicator for a channel with more than 227 thousand subscribers.

Why were about 61% of messages deleted from @rudra_cricket_analyst?

About 61% of message numbers are missing in the numbering of the channel's last 102 messages. We see only the fact of mass message deletion, but the exact reasons for this action by the administrator are not disclosed.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-10
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @rudra_cricket_analyst assessment dated 2026-10-10 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 227,521 subscribers, median post views were 5,979, ERR was 2.6%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.