TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @rubinday50

@rubinday50: statistics and cleanliness index

Рубиндей - ежедневные инвестиции

⚡Водку пью, акции покупаю. Инвестора из тебя сделаю, спасибо потом Рубиндею скажешь 🔹По рекламе https://t.me/igorrub50 🔹Или через биржу: https://telega.in/c/rubinday50

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
14,881
Median views
2,077
ERR
14%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Investments

Data from 2026-09-08 — 30 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel demonstrates stable organic activity with no signs of artificial inflation: a consistent reach of around 2,000 views and open comments confirm audience engagement.

However, advertising here is debatable due to the high-frequency conveyor format of nearly 29 posts per day, which means an ad post will be quickly buried by new entries and lose feed visibility within a matter of hours.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 5 Investments catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 14,338 to 33,784 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 4 of 5
@rubinday50 14%
similar channels median 23.3%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 4 of 5
@rubinday50 2.17
similar channels median 1.41

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 7 to Sep 8. The dashed line is the median (2,077).

01.1K2.3KSep 7: 2,183 viewsSep 7: 2,234 viewsSep 7: 2,240 viewsSep 7: 2,256 viewsSep 7: 2,262 viewsSep 7: 2,220 viewsSep 7: 2,216 viewsSep 7: 2,169 viewsSep 7: 2,148 viewsSep 7: 2,078 viewsSep 7: 2,093 viewsSep 7: 2,050 viewsSep 7: 2,008 viewsSep 7: 2,050 viewsSep 7: 2,014 viewsSep 7: 2,077 viewsSep 7: 2,035 viewsSep 7: 2,102 viewsSep 7: 2,109 viewsSep 7: 2,029 viewsSep 7: 2,117 viewsSep 7: 2,116 viewsSep 7: 2,130 viewsSep 7: 2,135 viewsSep 7: 2,112 viewsSep 7: 2,131 viewsSep 8: 2,057 viewsSep 8: 1,971 viewsSep 8: 2,027 viewsSep 8: 2,087 viewsSep 8: 1,821 viewsSep 8: 1,673 viewsSep 8: 1,703 viewsSep 8: 1,724 viewsSep 8: 1,511 viewsSep 8: 1,392 viewsSep 8: 1,348 viewsSep 8: 819 viewsSep 8: 676 viewsSep 8: 367 views Sep 7Sep 8
  • post views
  • 20 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 2,077

Maximum: 2,262 views. Data as of Sep 8.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 12: index 99, grade A+Jun 12Sep 8: index 100, grade A+Sep 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

So many posts that an ad quickly slides down the feed.

About 1,934–2,132 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

No advertising posts among the latest 40.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @rubinday50

Are there any signs of audience manipulation on the channel?

No, the risk score is 0 out of 100 with high check confidence. Views and engagement are distributed evenly, and the audience appears genuine.

What real reach can be expected from a publication?

The median reach per publication is around 2,077 views (ERR of about 13.96%). This metric has remained stable over recent months.

Why is the feasibility of advertising considered debatable?

Due to the high posting frequency (around 28-29 posts per day), an ad post quickly moves down the feed. Without a long pin or a posting pause in the feed, the publication may not have enough time to gain sufficient traction.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @rubinday50 assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 14,881 subscribers, median post views were 2,077, ERR was 14.0%, and the cleanliness index was 100/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.