TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @rendingerr

Fake engagement check for @rendingerr

Первобытный — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-11.

50/100
cleanliness index
Grade D
some signals require caution
Subscribers
1956
Median views
6737
ERR
344.4%
Posts sampled
1
Niche
Entertainment

The sample is small, so this assessment is preliminary.

Evidence snapshot

The @rendingerr assessment dated 2026-08-11 uses 1 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,956 subscribers, median post views were 6,737, ERR was 344.4%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

The recommendation is limited by manipulation risk: some views may be artificial.

Estimated 48-hour reach: about 6,737 views.

Low-confidence forecast because few posts were available.

What grade D means

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

Run a fresh check for @rendingerr

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-11. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @rendingerr

Questions about @rendingerr

What does grade D mean for @rendingerr?

The channel has several strong warning signals consistent with artificial engagement or an inactive subscriber base. Advertising is risky.

What is the ERR of @rendingerr?

ERR is 344.4%. Median post views equal 344.4% of the channel's 1,956 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 50/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Similar checked channels

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @rendingerr