Comprar publicidad 💵 Publicidad: @uzielrjc 🦾Otro metodo para publicidad es esta via: https://telega.io/c/RealMadrid_aficcionados
Assessment summary
The channel demonstrates stable organic metrics with a median of around 4.3 thousand views per post and a natural distribution of interest (CV 0.27). With an intensity of about 8 posts per day, a new message quickly moves down the feed, and the deletion of 18% of posts indicates regular cleanup of temporary ad integrations. Advertisers should target fast daytime contact with an active Spanish-speaking fan community, fixing the post's time at the top position.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-08-26
- Sample
- The latest 39 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @RealMadrid_aficcionados assessment dated 2026-08-26 uses 39 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 39,894 subscribers, median post views were 4,337, ERR was 10.9%, and the cleanliness index was 99/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Channel content
🚩 Possible scam or deception signals
The feed regularly publishes questionable ads featuring easy betting money schemes and promises of "fixed matches".
This is a separate content signal and does not change the manipulation-risk score.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: reasonable.
Estimated 48-hour reach: 2,979–3,436 views.
Reach of advertising posts
Only 2 advertising posts qualify for the calculation, which is not enough for a median. There are 4 advertising posts in total; the rest are less than two days old.
What grade A+ means
The channel shows almost no signs of manipulated engagement. Its public reach and audience activity are consistent with the subscriber count.
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 39 posts with views, from Aug 21 to Aug 26. The dashed line is the median (4,337).
- post views
- 9 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 4,337
The sample maximum is 7,597 views. Snapshot dated Aug 26; the axis is not clipped, so spikes remain visible.
What could not be calculated
View maturation was not assessed: the channel publishes frequently, and every sampled post is newer than one week.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once, so there is nothing to compare yet. The chart will appear after another check.
This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-26. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.
Buy advertising
The channel does not appear to be in the high-risk zone. These marketplaces provide channel catalogs, pricing, and payment on their own platforms.
TG Inspector does not sell placements or participate in the transaction. A specific channel may be absent from a marketplace.
Monitor this channel
Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.
Monitor @RealMadrid_aficcionadosQuestions about @RealMadrid_aficcionados
Are there any signs of metric manipulation on the channel?
The risk score is 1/100 with high audit confidence. There are no signs of artificial inflation of reach or reactions on the channel.
What is the actual reach of the posts?
The median view count is 4,337 per post, corresponding to an ERR engagement rate of around 10.9%. Comments are open, and the audience regularly reacts to content.
Is advertising on this channel justified?
Placement is considered justified due to the high-quality, genuine audience of the club. However, one should take into account the high posting frequency (about 8 posts per day) and the specific nature of third-party ads in the feed.
Similar channels in Entertainment
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 99 · A+
- 96 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
Other checked channels
This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.