TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @RealMadrid_aficcionados

@RealMadrid_aficcionados: statistics and cleanliness index

REAL MADRID C.F

Comprar publicidad 💵 Publicidad: @uzielrjc 🦾Otro metodo para publicidad es esta via: https://telega.io/c/RealMadrid_aficcionados

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-08-26
Subscribers
39,894
Median views
4,337
ERR
10.9%
Posts sampled
39

Data from 2026-08-26 — 45 days old.

Assessment summary

The channel demonstrates stable organic metrics with a median of around 4.3 thousand views per post and a natural distribution of interest (CV 0.27). With an intensity of about 8 posts per day, a new message quickly moves down the feed, and the deletion of 18% of posts indicates regular cleanup of temporary ad integrations.

Advertisers should target fast daytime contact with an active Spanish-speaking fan community, fixing the post's time at the top position.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Channel content

🚩 Possible scam or deception signals

The feed regularly publishes questionable ads featuring easy betting money schemes and promises of "fixed matches".

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 18 Recreation & Entertainment catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 15,439 to 89,147 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 14 of 18
@RealMadrid_aficcionados 10.9%
similar channels median 20.4%
Reactions per 100 views higher than 14 of 18
@RealMadrid_aficcionados 2.27
similar channels median 1.09

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 39 posts with views, from Aug 21 to Aug 26. The dashed line is the median (4,337).

03.8K7.6KAug 21: 4,287 viewsAug 21: 5,102 viewsAug 21: 4,889 viewsAug 21: 4,293 viewsAug 21: 3,997 viewsAug 21: 4,604 viewsAug 21: 4,341 viewsAug 21: 3,960 viewsAug 21: 4,442 viewsAug 21: 4,337 viewsAug 21: 4,331 viewsAug 21: 4,660 viewsAug 22: 4,585 viewsAug 22: 4,797 viewsAug 22: 4,912 viewsAug 22: 5,157 viewsAug 22: 6,316 viewsAug 22: 7,597 viewsAug 22: 4,848 viewsAug 23: 4,950 viewsAug 23: 4,316 viewsAug 23: 4,374 viewsAug 23: 4,507 viewsAug 23: 4,384 viewsAug 23: 4,094 viewsAug 24: 4,052 viewsAug 24: 4,322 viewsAug 24: 4,347 viewsAug 24: 4,543 viewsAug 25: 3,726 viewsAug 25: 3,087 viewsAug 25: 3,138 viewsAug 25: 3,214 viewsAug 25: 3,339 viewsAug 25: 3,282 viewsAug 25: 3,096 viewsAug 25: 2,654 viewsAug 25: 2,136 viewsAug 26: 224 views Aug 21Aug 26
  • post views
  • 9 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 4,337

Maximum: 7,597 views. Data as of Aug 26.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.

Cleanliness-index history

The channel's data has been collected once — the chart will appear after the next update.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

About 2,979–3,436 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 2. 2 more are too fresh.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @RealMadrid_aficcionados

Are there any signs of metric manipulation on the channel?

The risk score is 1/100 with high audit confidence. There are no signs of artificial inflation of reach or reactions on the channel.

What is the actual reach of the posts?

The median view count is 4,337 per post, corresponding to an ERR engagement rate of around 10.9%. Comments are open, and the audience regularly reacts to content.

Is advertising on this channel justified?

Placement is considered justified due to the high-quality, genuine audience of the club. However, one should take into account the high posting frequency (about 8 posts per day) and the specific nature of third-party ads in the feed.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-08-26
Sample
The latest 39 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @RealMadrid_aficcionados assessment dated 2026-08-26 uses 39 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 39,894 subscribers, median post views were 4,337, ERR was 10.9%, and the cleanliness index was 99/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.