TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @real_video_client

@real_video_client: statistics and cleanliness index

Видеомонтаж AI - ВАКАНСИИ 🎬

📌 Бесплатно выложить/удалить вакансию, сообщить о мошеннике, по рекламе, разбан: @alex_kedrin_v 📌 Канал резюме (бесплатно): @real_video_rezume

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-10-05
Subscribers
8,714
Median views
3,812
ERR
43.7%
Posts sampled
36
Niche Job Listings
Post language Russian
Channel age 3 years

Data from 2026-10-05 — 3 days old.

Assessment summary

A feed of job vacancies for video editors and neural network specialists, combined with analyses of job-hunting scams. Over the past three months, audience attention to posts has nearly quadrupled: the median view count rose from 1,031 to 3,812 with an audience of around 8.7 thousand subscribers.

At the same time, posts are published extremely rarely, and part of the message history has been deleted (around 99% of IDs are missing). Due to the irregular schedule, predicting the pace of view accumulation is difficult, making advertising placement here questionable.

What to pay attention to

Some messages deleted: ≈99% of IDs skipped

There are many gaps in the channel's recent message numbering, meaning some have been deleted. This counts message IDs rather than posts: each photo in an album has its own ID. Deleted posts are not visible, so the remaining ones provide only a partial picture of the channel.

What grade A means

Metrics look normal: no signals lowering the index were found, or they are weak.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 14 Job Listings catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 4,802 to 22,304 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 14 of 14
@real_video_client 43.7%
similar channels median 11.8%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 7 of 11
@real_video_client 0.3
similar channels median 1.03

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 36 posts with views, from Sep 9 to Oct 5. The dashed line is the median (3,812).

04.8K9.6KSep 9: 8,916 viewsApr 18: 9,626 viewsJul 21: 4,892 viewsDec 23: 6,828 viewsFeb 1: 6,589 viewsMar 7: 5,478 viewsMar 9: 5,608 viewsMar 17: 4,450 viewsMar 29: 4,152 viewsApr 8: 3,970 viewsApr 9: 4,127 viewsMay 3: 3,858 viewsMay 5: 3,957 viewsMay 21: 4,073 viewsJun 9: 3,767 viewsJun 12: 3,464 viewsJun 13: 4,623 viewsJun 16: 4,660 viewsJun 18: 5,270 viewsJul 13: 4,663 viewsJul 26: 3,520 viewsAug 2: 3,518 viewsAug 20: 1,982 viewsAug 21: 1,899 viewsSep 15: 2,131 viewsSep 19: 2,113 viewsSep 21: 1,795 viewsSep 22: 2,014 viewsSep 25: 1,873 viewsSep 25: 2,016 viewsSep 29: 1,886 viewsOct 2: 1,292 viewsOct 3: 1,195 viewsOct 4: 699 viewsOct 5: 429 viewsOct 5: 207 views Sep 9Oct 5
  • post views
  • 3 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
  • median 3,812

Maximum: 9,626 views. Data as of Oct 5.

No deviations in views. Views are only part of the metrics, so look at the whole index.

Cleanliness-index history

3 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 21: index 100, grade A+Jun 21Aug 14: index 50, grade DAug 14Oct 5: index 89, grade AOct 5

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Posts come out rarely, so an ad will struggle to get views.

About 947–1,892 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 2. 1 more are too fresh.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @real_video_client

What are the purity index and status of the channel @real_video_client?

The channel's purity index is 89 out of 100, which corresponds to grade A and a "metrics are normal" level. Reach metrics show no anomalies, and view variation falls within a typical operating range.

Why is advertising placement considered questionable?

The reason for the verdict is activity: new posts appear extremely rarely (averaging 0.0 publications per day). With such a schedule, it is difficult to predict in advance exactly when an ad will gather its views.

How many people read posts in this channel?

The median reach is about 3,812 views per post, meaning a post is seen by roughly 43.8% of the audience. At the same time, some messages in the channel sample have been deleted—around 99% of IDs are missing—and comments are closed.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-10-05
Sample
The latest 36 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @real_video_client assessment dated 2026-10-05 uses 36 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 8,714 subscribers, median post views were 3,812, ERR was 43.7%, and the cleanliness index was 89/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.