TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @rationalapp

@rationalapp: statistics and cleanliness index

Рациональный подход | Инвестиции

Трачу меньше, чем зарабатываю. Разницу инвестирую. Время работает на меня. Чат канала: https://t.me/+JTuZZt-v0PgzMjAy Личка: @mshashin

Share this report
Telegram

Grade A+ metrics look normal cleanliness index
data from 2026-09-08
Subscribers
2,321
Median views
1,032
ERR
44.5%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Investments

Data from 2026-09-08 — 30 days old.

Assessment summary

A low risk score (9/100) and stable view variance (CV 0.23) confirm the organic nature of a small audience of 2.3k subscribers. However, placement is classified as questionable due to a high ad load (the share of posts with external links reaches 95%) and regular feed cleanups (about 20% of posts deleted).

In such a flow, a third-party advertisement risks getting lost, and readers may exhibit banner blindness toward inbound links.

What to pay attention to

High share of ad posts (≈ 95%)

More than half of the posts contain links to other channels or an erid label. Weak indicator: the channel might be tailored for advertising resale.

What grade A+ means

The metrics agree with each other: views and reactions are distributed as usual, and almost no signals lower the index.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 13 Investments catalog channels whose metrics look normal. There are too few channels of a similar size, so the whole niche is used: 1,296 to 259,922 subscribers.

ERR (reach) higher than 12 of 13
@rationalapp 44.5%
similar channels median 15.5%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 10 of 13
@rationalapp 0.98
similar channels median 1.5

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jun 10 to Sep 6. The dashed line is the median (1,032).

06911.4KJun 10: 1,383 viewsJun 15: 1,052 viewsJun 17: 1,113 viewsJun 19: 1,056 viewsJun 20: 1,210 viewsJun 23: 1,318 viewsJun 26: 1,086 viewsJun 28: 1,136 viewsJul 1: 1,215 viewsJul 3: 1,181 viewsJul 5: 1,154 viewsJul 10: 1,124 viewsJul 12: 1,279 viewsJul 16: 1,097 viewsJul 17: 1,028 viewsJul 19: 1,307 viewsJul 24: 1,130 viewsJul 26: 1,184 viewsJul 31: 845 viewsAug 1: 925 viewsAug 2: 1,020 viewsAug 6: 950 viewsAug 7: 1,037 viewsAug 9: 1,047 viewsAug 13: 900 viewsAug 14: 1,000 viewsAug 15: 963 viewsAug 16: 1,065 viewsAug 18: 923 viewsAug 20: 854 viewsAug 21: 821 viewsAug 23: 758 viewsAug 26: 799 viewsAug 26: 906 viewsAug 28: 729 viewsAug 30: 675 viewsSep 1: 669 viewsSep 4: 522 viewsSep 4: 510 viewsSep 6: 410 views Jun 10Sep 6
  • post views
  • median 1,032

Maximum: 1,383 views. Data as of Sep 8.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 12: index 89, grade AJun 12Sep 8: index 91, grade A+Sep 8

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: not recommended.

Too many ads — yours will get lost.

About 351–702 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Almost every post is advertising, so there's nothing to compare with.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @rationalapp

Are there any signs of audience inflation on the channel?

The channel carries minimal risk of audience inflation (9 out of 100), demonstrating stable view dynamics (median 1,032) and natural reader engagement.

Why is ad placement marked as questionable?

The verdict was prompted by a high ad load: 95% of publications contain links to external resources or an erid label, and about 20% deleted posts were detected, causing ads to get lost in the feed.

What reach will an ad post get?

You should expect a median reach of 1,032 views (ERR around 44.5%), with posts published at a frequency of roughly one post every two days.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-09-08
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @rationalapp assessment dated 2026-09-08 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 2,321 subscribers, median post views were 1,032, ERR was 44.5%, and the cleanliness index was 91/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.