TG Inspector TG Inspector Add a channel
Avatar of @Pulse_GPT

@Pulse_GPT: statistics and cleanliness index

PulseGPT | Новости, нейросети, гайды

Новости, промпты и лайфхаки для работы с ИИ. Экономь время и твори вместе с нами! 🚀 Топовые нейросети всегда под рукой в удобном формате: 💻 На сайте: pulsegpt.ru 📱 В ТГ-боте: @PulseGPT 📩 Поддержка: @pulsegptsupport

Share this report
Telegram

Grade C some metrics deviate cleanliness index
data from 2026-08-25
Subscribers
45,928
Median views
1,961
ERR
4.3%
Posts sampled
40
Niche Computer science

Data from 2026-08-25 — 44 days old.

Assessment summary

With 46 thousand subscribers, posts get fewer than 2 thousand views, and the channel has lost over 1.5 thousand readers over the past two months. Disabled comments and an extremely low reaction rate (less than 0.1% of views) confirm that the audience barely engages with the content, which functions mainly as a showcase for their own AI service.

For an advertiser, this means paying for exposure to a narrow core of ~2,000 users without any guarantee of real response.

What to pay attention to

Views without engagement (reactions ≈ 0.089% of views)

Posts get views but almost no reactions. With this reach, someone usually reacts.

What grade C means

Some metrics fall outside usual values — for example reach, view spread or reactions. The “How the assessment was produced” section shows which ones.

Channel content

🤖 Possible AI-generated content

Posts and graphic cards are built on repetitive templates and created with extensive use of AI generation to promote their own bot.

Compared with similar channels

Compared with 30 Computer science catalog channels whose metrics look normal. They are a similar size: 15,450 to 127,953 subscribers.

ERR (reach) lower than 26 of 30
@Pulse_GPT 4.3%
similar channels median 8.2%
Reactions per 100 views lower than 26 of 27
@Pulse_GPT 0.09
similar channels median 0.35

This is not a niche norm: only catalog channels are included. A high ERR is not always a plus: if the other metrics do not support it, the index goes down.

Dynamics and anomalies

Views by post

The latest 40 posts with views, from Jun 8 to Aug 24. The dashed line is the median (1,961).

01.5K2.9KJun 8: 2,387 viewsJun 10: 2,038 viewsJun 12: 1,863 viewsJun 15: 1,811 viewsJun 17: 2,037 viewsJun 18: 2,083 viewsJun 19: 2,134 viewsJun 22: 2,095 viewsJun 24: 2,080 viewsJun 24: 2,603 viewsJun 24: 1,360 viewsJun 26: 2,207 viewsJun 29: 2,651 viewsJun 29: 2,909 viewsJun 29: 2,196 viewsJun 29: 1,433 viewsJul 1: 2,051 viewsJul 3: 2,032 viewsJul 6: 1,964 viewsJul 8: 2,092 viewsJul 10: 2,142 viewsJul 13: 2,051 viewsJul 15: 1,959 viewsJul 17: 2,076 viewsJul 21: 1,900 viewsJul 22: 1,880 viewsJul 24: 1,983 viewsJul 27: 1,798 viewsJul 29: 1,553 viewsJul 31: 1,809 viewsAug 3: 1,715 viewsAug 5: 1,565 viewsAug 7: 1,672 viewsAug 10: 1,535 viewsAug 12: 1,315 viewsAug 14: 1,427 viewsAug 18: 1,118 viewsAug 19: 1,096 viewsAug 21: 1,005 viewsAug 24: 639 views Jun 8Aug 24
  • post views
  • median 1,961

Maximum: 2,909 views. Data as of Aug 25.

What could not be calculated

View build-up not assessed: there were no posts newer than one day.

Cleanliness-index history

2 checks for this channel.

050100Jun 30: index 55, grade CJun 30Aug 25: index 55, grade CAug 25

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: questionable.

Only a small share of subscribers sees the posts.

About 741–1,481 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.

Reach of advertising posts

Too few advertising posts to compare: 2.

Buy advertising

Telegram ads are sold on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.

We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.

Where to buy advertising

Affiliate links: we get a commission. It never affects the channel's score.

Questions about @Pulse_GPT

What level of fake engagement risk is determined for the channel?

The risk is in the yellow zone (45 out of 100). The reasons are disabled comments and an abnormally low reaction rate relative to views.

Why is ad placement considered questionable?

Only about 4.3% of subscribers view the posts (median — 1,961 views), indicating audience burnout and passivity across most of the subscriber base.

What reach can be expected from an ad post?

Actual reach will be around 1.9–2 thousand views, as posts do not achieve broad viral reach due to infrequent posting and audience churn.

How the assessment was produced

Data source
Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
Date or snapshot
2026-08-25
Sample
The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
Calculation method
TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
Factual result
The @Pulse_GPT assessment dated 2026-08-25 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 45,928 subscribers, median post views were 1,961, ERR was 4.3%, and the cleanliness index was 55/100.
Limitations
This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data: it describes metrics, not the owner's actions, and is not a real-time measurement.

Full methodology and interpretation rules

This automated assessment is probabilistic: it describes the channel's public metrics, not its owner's actions. The index and grade are calculated from public data and are not changed on request. Channel owners can request removal of the page — t.me/TGinspector_ru.