Щоденні промокоди😋,ігри🥳,розіграши🤑 у чаті НАШ ЧАТ➡️ https://t.me/+w6SlaUrQC5hjNjM0 З ПИТАНЬ РЕКЛАМИ ЗВЕРТАТИСЯ ➡️ @OfficialManager_PS #SLOTOR777 #БЕЗДЕП #БОНУСИ #АЗАРТ
checked 2026-09-18
- Subscribers
- 12,455
- Median views
- 933
- ERR
- 7.5%
- Posts sampled
- 40
Assessment summary
About 74% of publications have been deleted from the feed, which in the gambling niche often masks ad delivery or statistics manipulation. With a median of 933 views, reaction engagement is minimal (only 0.2% of views), and the reach of promotional posts even exceeds regular ones by 11%. Such anomalies suggest likely partial view inflation, making placement questionable.
Compared with similar channels
Compared with 11 checked Bets & Gambling channels with no visible signs of manipulation. They are a similar size: 4,511 to 34,230 subscribers.
This is not a niche norm: only channels checked by the service are included. An unusually high ERR can also be a sign of inflated views.
How the assessment was produced
- Data source
- Public Telegram data: posts, views, reactions, and channel metadata.
- Date or snapshot
- 2026-09-18
- Sample
- The latest 40 public posts available at check time.
- Calculation method
- TG Inspector calculates metrics from the saved snapshot and combines independent signals into a deterministic 0–100 cleanliness index.
- Factual result
- The @PROMO_OT_SAINT assessment dated 2026-09-18 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 12,455 subscribers, median post views were 933, ERR was 7.5%, and the cleanliness index was 50/100.
- Limitations
- This is a probabilistic assessment based on public data, not proof of intentional manipulation or a real-time channel measurement.
Channel content
📣 Heavy advertising load
The channel consists entirely of affiliate posts with casino promo codes, links to no-deposit bonuses, and gaming bot advertisements.
Advertising outlook
Advertising placement: questionable.
Some of the views may be fake.
About 497–733 people will see your post in the first 48 hours.
Reach of advertising posts
Advertising posts have a median of 1,111 views versus 1,005 for regular posts — 11% higher.
Based on 20 advertising and 3 regular posts older than two days.
Without an ad label: 27 posts.
What grade D means
Clear signs of manipulation: several strong signals at once. Ads here are risky.
What to pay attention to
It looks like some posts were deleted (≈74% numbering gaps)
There are many gaps in the numbering of recent publications — some posts have been deleted. This is often done to hide completed ad campaigns and their actual reach. By itself, this indicator is indirect (posts can also be deleted during edits).
Dynamics and anomalies
Views by post
The latest 40 posts with views, from Sep 11 to Sep 18. The dashed line is the median (933).
- post views
- 9 posts newer than one day and still gaining views
- median 933
Maximum: 1,533 views. Data as of Sep 18.
What could not be calculated
View build-up not assessed: the channel posts often, and every post is newer than a week.
Cleanliness-index history
The channel has been checked once — the chart will appear after the next check.
Data from 2026-09-18 — 2 days old. Check the channel today before buying ads.
Buy advertising
No signs of manipulation. You can buy ads on these marketplaces — they have channel catalogs, prices, and checkout.
We don't sell ads. This channel may not be listed there.
Monitor this channel
The bot will recheck @PROMO_OT_SAINT and message you if reach drops, subscribers jump, or the cleanliness index changes.
Monitor @PROMO_OT_SAINTQuestions about @PROMO_OT_SAINT
What fake metric risk level was determined for the channel?
The risk score is 50 out of 100 (medium level). Suspicion is raised by the deletion of most recent posts and abnormally low reader activity.
What is the actual reach of the publications?
The median reach is 933 views with an ERR of about 7.5%. However, only a tiny fraction of the audience leaves reactions — 0.2% of viewers.
Is buying ads on this channel justified?
Placement is considered questionable due to the risk of inflated views. In addition, the feed is overloaded with links to third-party casinos, which will dilute audience attention to a new offer.
Similar channels in Bets & Gambling
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 100 · A+
- 99 · A+
All channels in Bets & Gambling
Other checked channels
- 97 · A+
- 50 · D
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 70 · B
- 98 · A+
- 70 · B
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
- 90 · A
- 50 · D
- 100 · A+
This automated assessment is probabilistic: statistical signals, not an accusation. Disagree? Run a fresh check in the bot. Want the page removed? Contact support and we'll take it down within a day.