TG Inspector TG Inspector
Avatar of @mllsbonus

Fake engagement check for @mllsbonus

MELLSTROY BONUS — public reach metrics and manipulation-risk assessment dated 2026-08-15.

Азартный телеграм Мелстроя / MELLSTROY

70/100
cleanliness index
Grade B
low manipulation risk
Subscribers
1705513
Median views
224329
ERR
13.2%
Posts sampled
40
Niche
Other

Evidence snapshot

The @mllsbonus assessment dated 2026-08-15 uses 40 recent public posts. At that snapshot the channel had 1,705,513 subscribers, median post views were 224,329, ERR was 13.2%, and the cleanliness index was 70/100.

Source: public Telegram counters captured during the saved check. The result can change after a new snapshot.

Advertising outlook

Advertising placement: reasonable.

Estimated 48-hour reach: 191,702–222,773 views.

Reach of advertising posts

Advertising posts have a median of 211,248 views versus 228,014 for organic posts.

Based on 8 advertising and 32 organic posts older than two days.

What grade B means

The channel is generally clean, with a few weak warning signals. Run a fresh check before a large advertising purchase.

Run a fresh check for @mllsbonus

This page shows the saved result dated 2026-08-15. The bot collects a new snapshot for a current report.

Monitor this channel

Monitoring reruns the assessment and sends an alert when ERR drops, subscribers change abnormally, or the cleanliness index moves.

Monitor @mllsbonus

Questions about @mllsbonus

What does grade B mean for @mllsbonus?

The channel is generally clean, with a few weak warning signals. Run a fresh check before a large advertising purchase.

What is the ERR of @mllsbonus?

ERR is 13.2%. Median post views equal 13.2% of the channel's 1,705,513 subscribers. ERR describes observed reach, not proof that every remaining subscriber is fake.

How does TG Inspector calculate the cleanliness index?

The 70/100 index combines several public-data signals, including reach relative to audience size, audience behavior, and channel metadata. It is a probabilistic assessment, not proof of intentional manipulation.

Other checked channels

@rublevskiii@banana_update@runyoksana@officialicybando@cherkasatlant@bankovshina@pro_ai_novosti@sereggadota@elon_musk_tesla_motors@itsdanilevskaya@redbictt1@mukhinss

Browse all checked channels

This automated assessment is probabilistic. It describes statistical signals in public data and does not claim intentional manipulation. Channel owners can run a new check or contact support to request removal.

Check @mllsbonus